Shortly before the Second Intermational Harvard Conference on Internet & Society, the Department of Justice ( DOJ ) brought a widely publicized suit against the Microsoft Corporation. In its complaint, the DOJ charged Microsoft with engaging in a variety of antitrust wrongs connected with its alleged monopoly position in the market for personal computer ( PC ) operating system software. The Conference panel on Antitrust and the Internet, which had planned to focus on how antitrust law affects standard-setting efforts and the implications for the Intermet, quickly abandoned that topic in favor of discussion of the Microsoft suit
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
Shortly before the Second Intermational Harvard Conference on Internet & Society, the Department of ...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
Not since the 1911 breakup of the Standard Oil trust has a government antitrust case attracted as mu...
Microsoft Corporation\u27s jousting with the Justice Department\u27s Antitrust Division over the las...
Some very significant developments in antitrust law have occurred in the last decade. Many have invo...
The Antitrust Division’s Microsoft case and the Federal Trade Commission’s Intel case both rested on...
RAPID developments in the software industry underlie both the Gov ernment\u27s antitrust proceedings...
As patent, copyright, and other intellectual property rights have assumed greater economic importanc...
The Microsoft antitrust case focused public attention on the role of antitrust enforcement in preser...
[[abstract]]Antitrust challenges against Microsoft, the world’s largest software company, have raise...
Microsoft Windows XP\u27s possible antitrust violations are addressed in relation to the U.S. v. Mic...
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
Shortly before the Second Intermational Harvard Conference on Internet & Society, the Department of ...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
Not since the 1911 breakup of the Standard Oil trust has a government antitrust case attracted as mu...
Microsoft Corporation\u27s jousting with the Justice Department\u27s Antitrust Division over the las...
Some very significant developments in antitrust law have occurred in the last decade. Many have invo...
The Antitrust Division’s Microsoft case and the Federal Trade Commission’s Intel case both rested on...
RAPID developments in the software industry underlie both the Gov ernment\u27s antitrust proceedings...
As patent, copyright, and other intellectual property rights have assumed greater economic importanc...
The Microsoft antitrust case focused public attention on the role of antitrust enforcement in preser...
[[abstract]]Antitrust challenges against Microsoft, the world’s largest software company, have raise...
Microsoft Windows XP\u27s possible antitrust violations are addressed in relation to the U.S. v. Mic...
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...