Plaintiffs, two interstate carriers and a municipal corporation, and defendants, four railroad companies, were parties to an investigation and suspension proceeding before the Interstate Commerce Commission. Section 15(7) of the Interstate Commerce Act allows the Commission to suspend the effectiveness of rate revisions proposed by carriers for seven months while it is deciding whether to approve them. If no decision is reached by the end of the suspension period, the proposed rates automatically become effective subject to a subsequent determination of their validity by the ICC. Expiration of the order suspending defendants\u27 rate proposals was imminent when, in an unprecedented attempt to maintain the status quo pending a final Commissi...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that under the Federal Courts Impr...
Recent Cases Administrative Law--Federal Trade Commission Act--Restitution Held Improper in Section ...
The public utility commission of Ohio refused to permit the plaintiff motor bus company to operate o...
Plaintiffs, two interstate carriers and a municipal corporation, and defendants, four railroad compa...
Appellee, an Illinois corporation engaged in manufacturing and selling candy within the state of Ill...
At the time the last session of Congress adjourned four important bills affecting the jurisdiction o...
In 1921 the Interstate Commerce Commission fixed a rate of 96.5 cents per cwt. as the maximum reason...
In its Keogh decision the Supreme Court held that although the Interstate Commerce Act did not exemp...
The railroad applied to the Interstate Commerce Commission for permission to carry out a general pro...
In 1998 the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided a handful of cases dealing with administrative...
The increasing tendency of state legislatures to establish administrative agencies to regulate vario...
Last Term the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of ...
Proceeding under section 5 of its organic act, the Federal Trade Commission issued an order requirin...
During its forty-five year life the Federal Trade Commission has gone through some difficult periods...
The Tax Injunction Act forbids federal courts from interfering with the “assessment, levy, or collec...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that under the Federal Courts Impr...
Recent Cases Administrative Law--Federal Trade Commission Act--Restitution Held Improper in Section ...
The public utility commission of Ohio refused to permit the plaintiff motor bus company to operate o...
Plaintiffs, two interstate carriers and a municipal corporation, and defendants, four railroad compa...
Appellee, an Illinois corporation engaged in manufacturing and selling candy within the state of Ill...
At the time the last session of Congress adjourned four important bills affecting the jurisdiction o...
In 1921 the Interstate Commerce Commission fixed a rate of 96.5 cents per cwt. as the maximum reason...
In its Keogh decision the Supreme Court held that although the Interstate Commerce Act did not exemp...
The railroad applied to the Interstate Commerce Commission for permission to carry out a general pro...
In 1998 the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided a handful of cases dealing with administrative...
The increasing tendency of state legislatures to establish administrative agencies to regulate vario...
Last Term the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of ...
Proceeding under section 5 of its organic act, the Federal Trade Commission issued an order requirin...
During its forty-five year life the Federal Trade Commission has gone through some difficult periods...
The Tax Injunction Act forbids federal courts from interfering with the “assessment, levy, or collec...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that under the Federal Courts Impr...
Recent Cases Administrative Law--Federal Trade Commission Act--Restitution Held Improper in Section ...
The public utility commission of Ohio refused to permit the plaintiff motor bus company to operate o...