In June 2019, the Securities & Exchange Commission made significant changes to the regulation of investment advice, issuing regulations and new interpretations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Industry advocates have argued that states lack power to enact their own regulations on the theory that various federal statutes and regulations combine to preempt and sharply limit state authority. This article examines the current state of reforms around the country and the policy and legal arguments for and against limiting state efforts to raise the standards for investment advice
In the late twentieth century, States around the world struck a Faustian bargain. They concluded tho...
This Article reviews three periods of investment company regulation by the Securities and Exchange C...
(Excerpt) The Investor-State Dispute System (“ISDS”) permits investors to sue states when their inve...
In June 2019, the Securities & Exchange Commission made significant changes to the regulation of inv...
The securities regulation landscape has changed dramatically in recent years. Federal laws have incr...
Recent years have seen a considerable increase in the amount of investment cases against both develo...
Warren discusses the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and the National Securities Market Imp...
This Article examines the right to regulate as the power of a sovereign state to adopt and maintai...
This Article examines the “right to regulate” as the power of a sovereign state to adopt and maintai...
Many critiques of investment treaties relate to concerns that tribunals’ interpretations of these ag...
(Excerpt) Decades of short-term thinking and regulatory fixes created the bewilderingly complex stat...
The purpose of this Article is to argue that Congress, notwithstanding the significant problems illu...
Each year, state securities regulators bring over twice the enforcement actions brought by the Secur...
The U.S. securities laws have repeatedly been assailed as burdensome or ineffective. Reform efforts ...
After decades of growth and popularity, the international investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) r...
In the late twentieth century, States around the world struck a Faustian bargain. They concluded tho...
This Article reviews three periods of investment company regulation by the Securities and Exchange C...
(Excerpt) The Investor-State Dispute System (“ISDS”) permits investors to sue states when their inve...
In June 2019, the Securities & Exchange Commission made significant changes to the regulation of inv...
The securities regulation landscape has changed dramatically in recent years. Federal laws have incr...
Recent years have seen a considerable increase in the amount of investment cases against both develo...
Warren discusses the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and the National Securities Market Imp...
This Article examines the right to regulate as the power of a sovereign state to adopt and maintai...
This Article examines the “right to regulate” as the power of a sovereign state to adopt and maintai...
Many critiques of investment treaties relate to concerns that tribunals’ interpretations of these ag...
(Excerpt) Decades of short-term thinking and regulatory fixes created the bewilderingly complex stat...
The purpose of this Article is to argue that Congress, notwithstanding the significant problems illu...
Each year, state securities regulators bring over twice the enforcement actions brought by the Secur...
The U.S. securities laws have repeatedly been assailed as burdensome or ineffective. Reform efforts ...
After decades of growth and popularity, the international investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) r...
In the late twentieth century, States around the world struck a Faustian bargain. They concluded tho...
This Article reviews three periods of investment company regulation by the Securities and Exchange C...
(Excerpt) The Investor-State Dispute System (“ISDS”) permits investors to sue states when their inve...