In times of populist mistrust towards experts, it is important and the aim of the paper to ascertain the rationality of arguments from expert opinion and to reconstruct their rational foundations as well as to determine their limits. The foundational approach chosen is probabilistic. However, there are at least three correct probabilistic reconstructions of such argumentations: statistical inferences, Bayesian updating, and interpretive arguments. To solve this competition problem, the paper proposes a recourse to the arguments' justification strengths achievable in the respective situation
Tribunals have come to depend increasingly on expertise for determining the facts in cases. However,...
This paper takes an argumentation approach to find the place of trust in a method for evaluating arg...
In this paper, I will try to answer the question: How are we supposed to assess the ...
In times of populist mistrust towards experts, it is important and the aim of the paper to ascertain...
The appeal to expert opinion is an argument form that uses the verdict of an expert to support a pos...
In this paper I present a proposal on how to conceptualise and handle probabilistic arguments in an ...
In this contribution, I will develop a comprehensive tool for the reconstruction and evaluation of a...
The appeal to expert opinion is an argument form that uses the verdict of an expert to support a pos...
In this paper, I argue that many arguments from expert opinion are strong arguments. Therefore, in m...
The aim of the paper is to develop general criteria of argumentative validity and adequacy for proba...
Expert opinion and judgment enter into the practice of statistical inference and decision-making in ...
In this paper, I argue that arguments from expert opinion, i.e., inferences from “Expert E says that...
The appeal to expert opinion is an argument form that uses the verdict of an expert to support a pos...
Recent multi-criteria group decision making methods focus their analysis on the experts preferences....
ABSTRACT: This article evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of arguments based on appeals to exper...
Tribunals have come to depend increasingly on expertise for determining the facts in cases. However,...
This paper takes an argumentation approach to find the place of trust in a method for evaluating arg...
In this paper, I will try to answer the question: How are we supposed to assess the ...
In times of populist mistrust towards experts, it is important and the aim of the paper to ascertain...
The appeal to expert opinion is an argument form that uses the verdict of an expert to support a pos...
In this paper I present a proposal on how to conceptualise and handle probabilistic arguments in an ...
In this contribution, I will develop a comprehensive tool for the reconstruction and evaluation of a...
The appeal to expert opinion is an argument form that uses the verdict of an expert to support a pos...
In this paper, I argue that many arguments from expert opinion are strong arguments. Therefore, in m...
The aim of the paper is to develop general criteria of argumentative validity and adequacy for proba...
Expert opinion and judgment enter into the practice of statistical inference and decision-making in ...
In this paper, I argue that arguments from expert opinion, i.e., inferences from “Expert E says that...
The appeal to expert opinion is an argument form that uses the verdict of an expert to support a pos...
Recent multi-criteria group decision making methods focus their analysis on the experts preferences....
ABSTRACT: This article evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of arguments based on appeals to exper...
Tribunals have come to depend increasingly on expertise for determining the facts in cases. However,...
This paper takes an argumentation approach to find the place of trust in a method for evaluating arg...
In this paper, I will try to answer the question: How are we supposed to assess the ...