Preprints are research reports have that have not yet been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. They have increased rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, high profile discredited studies have led to concerns that speed has been prioritized over the quality and credibility of evidence. Joeri Tijdink, Mario Malicki, Lex Bouter and Gowri Gopalakrishna argue that all stakeholders of the science system have a responsibility in improving the quality and credibility of pre-prints. They outline 5 steps by which this can be achieved
COVID-19 has led to rapid and open sharing of research outputs. But will this new, radically open re...
Last week the Impact Blog featured a post from Richard P. Phelps, in which he proposed that journals...
The drive to publish papers has created a hyper-competitive research environment in which researcher...
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Emerald via the DOI in t...
It has become increasingly clear that prevailing academic incentive structures have a potentially da...
Drawing on a recent analysis of APC pricing and movements within the commercial publishing sector, G...
While getting new information on COVID-19 is essential, not all research will be critical to managin...
The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented and time critical demand for policy relevant evidence...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
Taking stock of what Plan S – a funder led initiative to deliver widespread open access to research ...
An aspect of the media landscape that has been highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic has been the inc...
The recent announcement by the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) set out a require...
Taking stock of what Plan S – a funder-led initiative to deliver widespread open access to research ...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
COVID-19 has led to rapid and open sharing of research outputs. But will this new, radically open re...
Last week the Impact Blog featured a post from Richard P. Phelps, in which he proposed that journals...
The drive to publish papers has created a hyper-competitive research environment in which researcher...
Improving scientific publishing is often framed as an issue of openness and speed and less often as ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Emerald via the DOI in t...
It has become increasingly clear that prevailing academic incentive structures have a potentially da...
Drawing on a recent analysis of APC pricing and movements within the commercial publishing sector, G...
While getting new information on COVID-19 is essential, not all research will be critical to managin...
The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented and time critical demand for policy relevant evidence...
The peer review process has been subjected to a steady stream of criticism in recent years. This has...
Taking stock of what Plan S – a funder led initiative to deliver widespread open access to research ...
An aspect of the media landscape that has been highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic has been the inc...
The recent announcement by the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) set out a require...
Taking stock of what Plan S – a funder-led initiative to deliver widespread open access to research ...
Professor Fleur Johns offers 10 rules of thumb that have guided her own reviewing efforts and may pr...
COVID-19 has led to rapid and open sharing of research outputs. But will this new, radically open re...
Last week the Impact Blog featured a post from Richard P. Phelps, in which he proposed that journals...
The drive to publish papers has created a hyper-competitive research environment in which researcher...