A number of individuals and organizations have considerable influence over the selection of global health priorities and strategies. For some that influence derives from control over financial resources. For others it comes from expertise and claims to moral authority—what can be termed, respectively, epistemic and normative power. In contrast to financial power, we commonly take for granted that epistemic and normative forms of power are legitimate. I argue that we should not; rather we should investigate the origins of these forms of power, and consider under what circumstances they are justly derived
This article agrees with recent arguments suggesting that normative and epistemic power is rife with...
In this comment, I build on Shiffman’s call for the global health community to more deeply investiga...
This article contends that legitimacy in the exercise of power comes from the consent ...
A number of individuals and organizations have considerable influence over the selection of global h...
This article agrees with recent arguments suggesting that normative and epistemic power is rife with...
This article agrees with recent arguments suggesting that normative and epistemic power is rife with...
Shiffman rightly raises questions about who exercises power in global health, suggesting power is a ...
Shiffman rightly raises questions about who exercises power in global health, suggesting power is a ...
Shiffman rightly raises questions about who exercises power in global health, suggesting power is a ...
Jeremy Shiffman’s editorial appropriately calls on making all forms of power more apparent and accou...
In this paper we emphasize the importance of questioning the global validity of significant concepts...
Shiffman has argued that some actors have a great deal of power in global health, and...
Shiffman has argued that some actors have a great deal of power in global health, and that more refl...
Actors working in global health often portray it as an enterprise grounded in principled concerns, a...
Jeremy Shiffman’s editorial appropriately calls on making all forms of power more apparent and accou...
This article agrees with recent arguments suggesting that normative and epistemic power is rife with...
In this comment, I build on Shiffman’s call for the global health community to more deeply investiga...
This article contends that legitimacy in the exercise of power comes from the consent ...
A number of individuals and organizations have considerable influence over the selection of global h...
This article agrees with recent arguments suggesting that normative and epistemic power is rife with...
This article agrees with recent arguments suggesting that normative and epistemic power is rife with...
Shiffman rightly raises questions about who exercises power in global health, suggesting power is a ...
Shiffman rightly raises questions about who exercises power in global health, suggesting power is a ...
Shiffman rightly raises questions about who exercises power in global health, suggesting power is a ...
Jeremy Shiffman’s editorial appropriately calls on making all forms of power more apparent and accou...
In this paper we emphasize the importance of questioning the global validity of significant concepts...
Shiffman has argued that some actors have a great deal of power in global health, and...
Shiffman has argued that some actors have a great deal of power in global health, and that more refl...
Actors working in global health often portray it as an enterprise grounded in principled concerns, a...
Jeremy Shiffman’s editorial appropriately calls on making all forms of power more apparent and accou...
This article agrees with recent arguments suggesting that normative and epistemic power is rife with...
In this comment, I build on Shiffman’s call for the global health community to more deeply investiga...
This article contends that legitimacy in the exercise of power comes from the consent ...