Comparison of Slovenian spoken language and Slovenian sign language word formation

Magistrska naloga z naslovom Primerjava slovenskega jezika s slovenskim znakovnim jezikom na področju besedotvorja pri obeh jezikovnih sistemih predstavlja ključne elemente, ki so ali bi lahko bili pomembni pokazatelji tvorjenosti. Ob primeru besedila na temo promet ter posnetkih desetih informatorjev v slovenskem znakovnem jeziku sta vzporedno analizirana oba jezikovna sistema. V slovenskem besedotvorju je ob primerih gradivo predstavljeno in uvrščeno v posamezni tip. Pri znakotvorju se izkažeta kot možna tipa zlaganje in izpeljava. Slovensko besedotvorje temelji na podlagi besedotvornih tipov, kot jih predstavlja prof. dr. Ada Vidovič Muha. Znakotvorje pa za oporo jemlje poznavanje o znakotvorju v znakovnih jezikih iz angleške literature, avtorjev Josepa Quera in Josepha C. Hilla. Predvsem pa je poudarek na kazateljih, ki bi lahko pomagali pri razlikovanju med tvorjeno in netvorjeno kretnjo ter na skromnih osnutkih možne tipologije tvorjenosti.The thesis Comparison of Slovenian spoken language and Slovenian sign language word formation presents key elements in both language systems that are or may be important indicators of compounded forms. Both language systems are subject to a parallel analysis based on a text on traffic and video recordings of ten Slovenian Sign Language users. Material on Slovene word formation is presented and categorised into individual types with the help of examples. Compounding and derivation appear to be possible processes in sign formation. Slovene word formation is based on word formation types as presented by prof. Ada Vidovič Muha, PhD. The section on sign formation relies on the knowledge on the topic in the English material by Josep Quer and Joseph C. Hill. The thesis is mainly focused on indicators that may help in determining whether a sign is compounded or not and on the modest outlines of the possible typology of compounding