Fly wing evolution explained by a neutral model with mutational pleiotropy

To what extent the speed of mutational production of phenotypic variation determines the rate of long‐term phenotypic evolution is a central question. Houle et al. recently addressed this question by studying the mutational variances, additive genetic variances, and macroevolution of locations of vein intersections on fly wings, reporting very slow phenotypic evolution relative to the rates of mutational input, high phylogenetic signals, and a strong, linear relationship between the mutational variance of a trait and its rate of evolution. Houle et al. found no existing model of phenotypic evolution to be consistent with all these observations, and proposed the improbable scenario of equal influence of mutational pleiotropy on all traits. Here, we demonstrate that the purported linear relationship between mutational variance and evolutionary divergence is artifactual. We further show that the data are explainable by a simple model in which the wing traits are effectively neutral at least within a range of phenotypic values but their evolutionary rates are differentially reduced because mutations affecting these traits are purged owing to their different pleiotropic effects on other traits that are under stabilizing selection. Thus, the evolutionary patterns of fly wing morphologies are explainable under the existing theoretical framework of phenotypic evolution.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162712/3/evo14076.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162712/2/evo14076-sup-0001-SuppMat.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162712/1/evo14076_am.pd