This book aims to show that recent developments in neuroscience permit a defense of free will. Through language, human beings can escape strict biological determinism. Readership: All interested in the philosophy of sciences, in the philosophy of mind, in the philosophy of language, in the cognitive sciences, in anthropology, and anyone interested by the question of the relation between brain and free will
The article focuses on the issue of brain determinism, by examining two recent neuroscien-tific expe...
Marcelo Fischborn discusses the significance of neuroscience for debates about free will. Although h...
We argue, contra Joshua Knobe in a companion chapter, that most people have an understanding of free...
This book aims to show that recent developments in neuroscience permit a defense of free will. Throu...
This paper examines the extent to which neuroscience as a scientific field supports the existence of...
The debate involving neuroscience and free will tends to accentuate two positions, a (bio) determini...
The problem of free will is among the most fascinating and disputed questions throughout the history...
This chapter argues that free will is not a presupposition of criminal law, or any other area of law...
The debates on whether human beings have free will have been widely held in many fields such as phil...
In this article we study the question of free will from an interdisciplinary angle, drawing on philo...
Philosophical debates about free will have focused on determinism—a potential ‘threat from behind’ b...
Even though at the beginning of the 1980s the results of the first neuroscience experiments made som...
In this article we study the question of free will from an interdisciplinary angle, drawing on philo...
Even though at the beginning of the 1980s the results of the first neuroscience experiments made som...
In this chapter I review recent work on neuroscientific threats to free will. What is it for somethi...
The article focuses on the issue of brain determinism, by examining two recent neuroscien-tific expe...
Marcelo Fischborn discusses the significance of neuroscience for debates about free will. Although h...
We argue, contra Joshua Knobe in a companion chapter, that most people have an understanding of free...
This book aims to show that recent developments in neuroscience permit a defense of free will. Throu...
This paper examines the extent to which neuroscience as a scientific field supports the existence of...
The debate involving neuroscience and free will tends to accentuate two positions, a (bio) determini...
The problem of free will is among the most fascinating and disputed questions throughout the history...
This chapter argues that free will is not a presupposition of criminal law, or any other area of law...
The debates on whether human beings have free will have been widely held in many fields such as phil...
In this article we study the question of free will from an interdisciplinary angle, drawing on philo...
Philosophical debates about free will have focused on determinism—a potential ‘threat from behind’ b...
Even though at the beginning of the 1980s the results of the first neuroscience experiments made som...
In this article we study the question of free will from an interdisciplinary angle, drawing on philo...
Even though at the beginning of the 1980s the results of the first neuroscience experiments made som...
In this chapter I review recent work on neuroscientific threats to free will. What is it for somethi...
The article focuses on the issue of brain determinism, by examining two recent neuroscien-tific expe...
Marcelo Fischborn discusses the significance of neuroscience for debates about free will. Although h...
We argue, contra Joshua Knobe in a companion chapter, that most people have an understanding of free...
DOI
Add to ORKG