Correction to: Demography and population projection of Myzus persicae (Sulz.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on five pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars (Phytoparasitica, (2018), 46, 2, (153-167), 10.1007/s12600-018-0651-0)

Following publication of the above article (https://doi. org/10.1007/s12600-018-0651-0) Phytoparasitica (First Online: 20 February 2018), the following errors were found: – Page 4: Right column, the fourth line beneath Eq. (12): “Eq. 3 can be written as” should be corrected to “Eq. 5 can be written as”. – Page 4: Left column, the second line beneath Eq. (13): “Eq. 11 can be simplified to” should be corrected to “Eq. 13 can be simplified to”. – Page 4: Left column, the third line beneath Eq. (14): The term (Formula presented.). Page 8: Right column, the last paragraph: There are five “intrinsic rate”. They should be corrected to “finite rate”. Page 8: Right column, the sixth line in last paragraph: “ascendin” should be corrected to “ascending”. The ninth line: “normal” should be corrected to “frequency”. Page 9: First line: “Fig. 3” should be corrected to “Fig. 4”. – Page 9: Left column, the sixth line in the last paragraph: “Fig. 3” should be corrected to “Fig. 4”. – Page 10: In the figure caption: “Fig. 4” should be corrected to “Fig. 5”. – Page 11: First line: “Fig. 5” should be corrected to “Fig. 6”. Page 12: First line: “Fig. 6. The total population size of Myzus persicae on different pepper cultivars.” should be corrected to “Fig. 3. Top figure: The 200,000 finite rates ordered according to original bootstrap order (x-axis). The 200,000 finite rates fluctuated randomly around the mean. Middle figure: The 200,000 finite rates sorted in ascending order. Bottom figure: The 200,000 finite rates shown as a frequency distribution. The 0.025 and 0.975 percentiles of finite rates can be obtained from the middle or bottom figures.” The authors wish to apologize for the errors within this article. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature