Add to ORKGThis paper discusses the concept of public use following the Supreme Court decision in the eminent domain case of Kelo v. City of New London. The majority of the Court now equates public use to public purpose and approves of the Connecticut local economic development statute. The Kelo decision has generated considerable controversy. It is suggested that one approach to the resolution of the issue is the application of the economist’s dual tests for the efficacy of public intervention in the private economy—existence of market failure and benefits that exceed costs.2007_10_25_McDonald.pdf: 794 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020
The controversial ruling in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut was an impetus for a...
Eminent domain has been a government power for centuries. In most cases, eminent domain is used to p...
Governments, both state and federal, have the right to take private property for public use, provide...
Published just weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court handed down their controversial decision on Kelo ...
Eminent Domain is the legal term describing the government's right to take private property, without...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
The public use requirement of eminent domain law may be working its way back into the United States ...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
This short Essay explores the Supreme Court\u27s suggestion in Kelo v. New London that public, parti...
The fifth amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as most state constitutions, provides...
Government officials regularly use the power of eminent domain to benefit private entities, and just...
This paper investigates changes of interpretations about the taking clause and public use based on t...
The Kelo decision has unleashed a tidal wave of legislative reforms ostensibly seeking to control em...
The tension between private property rights, human rights, and community are at an all time high in ...
The Supreme Court\u27s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London brought the issues of takings and...
The controversial ruling in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut was an impetus for a...
Eminent domain has been a government power for centuries. In most cases, eminent domain is used to p...
Governments, both state and federal, have the right to take private property for public use, provide...
Published just weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court handed down their controversial decision on Kelo ...
Eminent Domain is the legal term describing the government's right to take private property, without...
which held that the government can force the sale of private property for the purpose of economic de...
The public use requirement of eminent domain law may be working its way back into the United States ...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
This short Essay explores the Supreme Court\u27s suggestion in Kelo v. New London that public, parti...
The fifth amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as most state constitutions, provides...
Government officials regularly use the power of eminent domain to benefit private entities, and just...
This paper investigates changes of interpretations about the taking clause and public use based on t...
The Kelo decision has unleashed a tidal wave of legislative reforms ostensibly seeking to control em...
The tension between private property rights, human rights, and community are at an all time high in ...
The Supreme Court\u27s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London brought the issues of takings and...
The controversial ruling in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut was an impetus for a...
Eminent domain has been a government power for centuries. In most cases, eminent domain is used to p...
Governments, both state and federal, have the right to take private property for public use, provide...