Vita.The demand for money has been a subject of considerable research in the past. Most of the empirical work to date has tried to determine whether a long-term rate of interest or a short-term rate is a better measure of the opportunity cost of holding money. Both theory and evidence have given conflicting answers. Some argue that the interest rate on long-term bonds is relevant, since it is more representative of the average rate of return on capital in the economy and therefore a better indicator of the opportunity cost of holding money than is the yield on short-term debts. Others contend that short-term securities are closer substitutes for money than longer-term bonds so that the short-term rates are more relevant. The results varied ...