From Adiabatic to Dispersive Readout of Quantum Circuits

International audienceSpectral properties of a quantum circuit are efficiently read out by monitoring the resonance frequency shift it induces in a microwave resonator coupled to it. When the two systems are strongly detuned, theory attributes the shift to an effective resonator capacitance or inductance that depends on the quantum circuit state. At small detuning, the shift arises from the exchange of virtual photons, as described by the Jaynes-Cummings model. Here we present a theory bridging these two limits and illustrate, with several examples, its necessity for a general description of quantum circuits readout. Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics (cQED) is at the heart of most advanced superconducting quantum technologies. Different types of superconducting qubits can be strongly coupled to microwave resonators thus achieving regimes and phenomenena which cannot be reached within the realm of quantum optics [1]. More recently, strong coupling between microwave resonators and a variety of other quantum systems not necessarily involving superconductors has been achieved [2], extending further the realm of cQED. In all these applications the measurement of the qubit or the hybrid device state is achieved by monitoring the resonator properties. Theoretically , two regimes have been approached using disconnected descriptions [3]: the dispersive regime, where the qubit-resonator detuning is larger than the coupling strength yet small enough to allow the exchange of virtual photons, and the adiabatic regime, where the de-tuning is sufficiently large for virtual processes to be strongly suppressed. The dispersive regime, which describes level repulsion between those of the quantum circuit and of the resonator, is typically dealt with using a Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian within different levels of approximation [3-10]. In contrast, the adiabatic regime accounts for the renormalization of the resonator capaci-tance/inductance by the effective capacitance of the circuit , including its "quantum capacitance" [11, 12], or its effective inductance [13, 14], which modifies the resonator frequency [15, 16]. However, there is no actual border between these two regimes which could justify a separate treatment, as illustrated by recent experiments on hybrid cQED setups [17] that reveal features of both regimes for the same device. This situation claims for a unified description of quantum circuits readout, going beyond the standard Jaynes-Cummings model, which could be applied to different types of devices over a large range of parameters. * Corresponding author : a.l.yeyati@uam.es In the present Letter we derive a general expression for the resonator frequency shift when coupled to a generic quantum circuit. This expression naturally interpolates between the adiabatic and the dispersive regimes, thus allowing to clarify their origin from the same coupling Hamiltonian. In addition our formalism is not restricted to the usual two-level approximations but any multilevel situation can be described on the same footing. We illustrate the importance of the different terms in our expression by analyzing well-known models like a short single channel superconducting weak link hosting Andreev states, the RF-SQUID and the Cooper pair box. Resonator-quantum circuit coupling.-The system we consider comprises a resonant circuit and a quantum circuit coupled through phase or charge fluctuations as depicted in Figs. 1(a), 2(a) and in the inset of Fig. 3. The resonant circuit is represented as a lumped-element LC resonator with bare resonance frequency f r = ω r /2π, with ω r = 1/ √ L r C r. Introducing the photon annihilation (creation) operators a (a †), it can be described by the Hamiltonian H r = ω r a † a. On the other hand, the quantum circuit Hamiltonian,Ĥ qc (x), depends on a dimensionless control parameter x, corresponding to an excess charge on a capacitor or a flux through a loop. We denote by |Φ i (x) the eigenstates of the uncoupled quantum circuit,Ĥ qc (x)|Φ i (x) = E i (x)|Φ i (x). Flux (charge) fluctuations in the resonator lead to x → x 0 +x r , wherex r = λ(s a + s * a †) with a coupling constant λ, depending on a coupling scheme [19], and s = 1 (−i). We assume λ 1 in accordance with experiments. The resonator-quantum circuit coupling HamiltonianĤ c is obtained by expandingĤ qc (x 0 +x r) up to second order inx rĤ c (x 0) =x rĤ qc (x 0) +x 2 r 2Ĥ qc (x 0), (1) where the prime stands for the derivative with respect to x. The Hamiltonian describing resonator, quantu