Add to ORKGHaving accidentally met with Mr. Reeve's monograph of the genus Haliotis, and observing several points which require either correction or elucidation, I have thrown together the following notes, which, as they chiefly refer to such species as I have met with in this hemisphere, will probably be considered worthy a place in the Transactions of the Society
In the Proceedings for 1877 this Society did me the honor to publish in its pages a Census of the M...
Haliotis pourtalesii Dall, 1881 has so far only been reported from the Gulf of Mexico. The localitie...
Haliotis unilateralis Lamarck, 1822 Haliotis unilateralis Lamarck, 1822 a: 217, no. 11. Geiger, 1...
Cox (1962) gave an excellent historical review of all published works on Haliotis beginning with Ari...
When Woodward classed the terrestrial mollusks of Tasmania, with those of Australia, south of the t...
Some time ago I received from Captain Beddome, of Hobart, several specimens of three species of Chi...
Discussion on the classification of several shells. A revision of the nomenclature of the freshwate...
Our knowledge of Australian mollusca is almost confined to descriptions from the shells alone. Near...
The publication of the Rev. J. E. Tenison-Woods' paper, in enabhng collectors to determine and comp...
Having visited many parts of our island but little known to the general traveller, I have, during t...
In the Proceedings of the Royal Society for last year (1875), I published descriptions of 82 new ma...
This paper was commenced over a year ago as a joint paper in collaboration with the late W. L. May, ...
No attempt has yet been made to arrange the freshwater shells of Tasmania. The land shells have be...
On the 9th August, 1875, I read before this Society a paper on the Freshwater Shells of Tasmania, w...
FAMILY: HALIOTIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 Haliotis Linnaeus, 1758. Type species (s.d. Montfort 1810): Ha...
In the Proceedings for 1877 this Society did me the honor to publish in its pages a Census of the M...
Haliotis pourtalesii Dall, 1881 has so far only been reported from the Gulf of Mexico. The localitie...
Haliotis unilateralis Lamarck, 1822 Haliotis unilateralis Lamarck, 1822 a: 217, no. 11. Geiger, 1...
Cox (1962) gave an excellent historical review of all published works on Haliotis beginning with Ari...
When Woodward classed the terrestrial mollusks of Tasmania, with those of Australia, south of the t...
Some time ago I received from Captain Beddome, of Hobart, several specimens of three species of Chi...
Discussion on the classification of several shells. A revision of the nomenclature of the freshwate...
Our knowledge of Australian mollusca is almost confined to descriptions from the shells alone. Near...
The publication of the Rev. J. E. Tenison-Woods' paper, in enabhng collectors to determine and comp...
Having visited many parts of our island but little known to the general traveller, I have, during t...
In the Proceedings of the Royal Society for last year (1875), I published descriptions of 82 new ma...
This paper was commenced over a year ago as a joint paper in collaboration with the late W. L. May, ...
No attempt has yet been made to arrange the freshwater shells of Tasmania. The land shells have be...
On the 9th August, 1875, I read before this Society a paper on the Freshwater Shells of Tasmania, w...
FAMILY: HALIOTIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 Haliotis Linnaeus, 1758. Type species (s.d. Montfort 1810): Ha...
In the Proceedings for 1877 this Society did me the honor to publish in its pages a Census of the M...
Haliotis pourtalesii Dall, 1881 has so far only been reported from the Gulf of Mexico. The localitie...
Haliotis unilateralis Lamarck, 1822 Haliotis unilateralis Lamarck, 1822 a: 217, no. 11. Geiger, 1...