The field of Information Systems (IS) has been attacked for its lack of tradition and focus. This paper suggests that the criticisms are based on the misunderstandings of the nature of Information Systems, both inside and outside the field. The paper begins by extending the fragmentation problem seen by Information Systems to the hierarchical model for knowledge expounded by the universities. It then examines the limitations of existing frameworks for defining IS, and introduces an evolutionary approach. This paper reconceptualizes Information Systems and demonstrates that it has evolved to be part of an emerging discipline of fields, Informing Science.</p
In this paper, we respond to McBride’s (2018) paper on whether information systems is a science. We ...
The dominant way of producing knowledge in information systems (IS) seeks to domesticate high-level ...
This paper explores the issue of whether the field of IS is in crisis. To do so, the paper first sta...
Some researchers have compared the information systems discipline with the physical and biological s...
The Information Systems (IS) discipline is over a third of a century old. It is a multidisciplinary ...
peer-reviewedThis paper provides a detailed assessment of the current status of the Information Syst...
This paper provides a detailed assessment of the current status of the Information Systems (IS) fiel...
The Information Systems (IS) discipline is apparently undergoing an identity crisis. Academicians qu...
This paper provides a detailed assessment of the current status of the Information Systems (IS) fiel...
This paper explores challenges of the evolution of the concept of Information Systems (IS) and its i...
This paper aims to shed light on the dynamics of information systems (IS) as a discipline in the mak...
The conventional wisdom amongst information systems (IS) researchers is that information systems is ...
When designing information systems as complex systems through Information Systems (IS) discipline, r...
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Currently, there are many perspectives aiming to account for what the...
Purpose: The present paper addresses the problem of the information systems (IS) identity, in partic...
In this paper, we respond to McBride’s (2018) paper on whether information systems is a science. We ...
The dominant way of producing knowledge in information systems (IS) seeks to domesticate high-level ...
This paper explores the issue of whether the field of IS is in crisis. To do so, the paper first sta...
Some researchers have compared the information systems discipline with the physical and biological s...
The Information Systems (IS) discipline is over a third of a century old. It is a multidisciplinary ...
peer-reviewedThis paper provides a detailed assessment of the current status of the Information Syst...
This paper provides a detailed assessment of the current status of the Information Systems (IS) fiel...
The Information Systems (IS) discipline is apparently undergoing an identity crisis. Academicians qu...
This paper provides a detailed assessment of the current status of the Information Systems (IS) fiel...
This paper explores challenges of the evolution of the concept of Information Systems (IS) and its i...
This paper aims to shed light on the dynamics of information systems (IS) as a discipline in the mak...
The conventional wisdom amongst information systems (IS) researchers is that information systems is ...
When designing information systems as complex systems through Information Systems (IS) discipline, r...
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Currently, there are many perspectives aiming to account for what the...
Purpose: The present paper addresses the problem of the information systems (IS) identity, in partic...
In this paper, we respond to McBride’s (2018) paper on whether information systems is a science. We ...
The dominant way of producing knowledge in information systems (IS) seeks to domesticate high-level ...
This paper explores the issue of whether the field of IS is in crisis. To do so, the paper first sta...