The Exit Mechanism of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects

[[abstract]]本研究首先由相關文獻之蒐集與探討，歸納促參案件執行不良之情況及要件，並從相關法律條文與契約範本之規定中，整理促參案件執行不良之相關法律規範，探討促參案件退場之要件原因，再透過案例蒐集與比對之方式，瞭解國內實際案例造成終止之要件，並繪製成促參契約退場之架構圖，以表示我國促參案件退場之原因架構，提供將來主辦機關採用促參模式辦理公共建設時，能依此作為審核廠商之依據，並避免相關情事再發生。 經本研究探討我國促參案件執行不良退場之實例後，於本研究探討範圍內，發現我國促參契約發生退場之原因，共有以下七點： 1 施工進度嚴重落後 2 未繳納履約保證金 3 未遵期開始營運 4 逾期未繳納權利金或土地租金 5 營運項目違反投資計畫使用規定 6 未依計畫、興建或營運計畫書辦理者 7 乙方財務困難致無法繼續履約者。[[abstract]]This study first conducted literature review to generalize the situations and factors of the poor execution of the cases and reorganize the regulations for the poor execution according to the related regulations and examples of the contracts in order to explore the reasons of the exit of the cases By case collection and comparison this study identified the factors of the termination of the real cases in Taiwan and developed the framework of the exit of the contracts as the reasons of the exit of the cases in Taiwan The findings can serve as reference for the authorities to select the companies when handling infrastructure projects in order to avoid repeated failure After examining the real examples of the exit of the failure cases in Taiwan this study concludes the following reasons: 1 Serious delays of the construction 2 Fail to pay the deposit for the contract 3 Fail to start the operation according to the schedule 4 Fail to pay the premium or rent of the land before the deadline 5 Items of operation violate the regulations of the investment projects 6 Fai to follow the project construction or business plan 7 Party B cannot continue the contract due to financial difficultie