Access Charges of Mobile Communications

[[abstract]]行動通訊既然已成為消費者最常使用的通訊服務，從消費者的觀點，最想瞭解是自己所使用的行動通訊服務與相對應的通訊費率是否合理。但在行動通訊最常見的跨網通訊（即發話端與受話端不在同一個行動通訊話務網路內），跨網通訊費率涵蓋的範圍，除了發話產生的成本與費用及相關合理加成之外，最為複雜也極為重要的部份，尌是使用受話網路所需支付的接續費。接續費的訂定，攸關消費者最關心的通話費率高低。但是接續費是依據何種基礎與方式所訂定，主管機關與通訊業者並未主動公開提供給消費者知悉，所以接續費的計算方式尌成為關係通訊事業營收與消費者支付通訊費用的關鍵議題。 根據我國電信相關法規的規定，行動通訊事業的接續費率的制定原則上由互連雙方業者協商訂定，行動通訊新進業者與既有市場主導業者之間的接續費費率，若是在市場未形成未完全競爭狀態前，貿然以雙方協商方式合議，市場主導者極有可能以其既有市場的競爭優勢、拖延互連時程，限制新進業者必頇接受較為不合理的互連條件（接受非為互連所必頇的網路互連元件或以較不公帄的接續費率），導致限制競爭，所以管制機關勢必要介入規管，來確保整個行動通訊市場能夠在公帄合理的狀態下促進市場的有效競爭，才可能達成電信法「維護使用者權益」終極目的。 第一章先尌研究背景、動機與研究範圍進行說明，第二章則以接續費計算方式與成本基礎進一步作比較。第三章對於固網與行動通訊接續議題作討論，並以美國Iowa Utility v FCC與Verizon v FCC兩案例之判決，闡述美國法院對接續費計算方法與成本基礎的觀點。第四章前半部概述英國通訊市場，後半部為英國行動語音批發接續文件內容，及英國競爭委員會上訴法院的判決作說明，以瞭解英國對於行動接續議題的競爭法制與管制思維。第五章主要是將我國行動接續狀態作整理，並以澳洲行動接續管制作比對。第六章則是統整各章節意見，提出相關結論與建議。[[abstract]]Since the mobile has become the most commonly used in consumer communications services from a consumer's point of view most would like to know is their use of mobile communications services and the corresponding communication rates are reasonable However in mobile communications the most common cross-Netcom inquiry Rate of cross-Netcom scope of inquiry in addition to caller generated by fees and related costs and a reasonable addition the most complex and extremely important part of the network is the use of words required to pay the continuation fee Follow-up fees set at stake consumers are most concerned about high and low calling rates But what kind of follow-up fee is based on the foundation and the manner in which to set the competent authorities and the communications industry did not take the initiative to make publicly available to consumers are aware of it so follow the method for calculating the fee becomes the cause of the relationship between communications and consumer revenue to pay the cost of communications key topics According to the provisions of relevant laws and regulations of telecommunications mobile communications industry to develop the principle of follow-up rates by the interconnection industry consultations both set new mobile communications industry and the existing market-led follow-up between industry fee rates if in the market do not form a state of perfect competition is not hastily to both collegial consultations market leaders most likely market for its existing competitive advantages the interconnection delay time restrictions on new industry must accept more unreasonable interconnection conditions leading to restricting competition so the control authority is bound to be involved in regulation to ensure that the entire mobile communications market in a fair and reasonable conditions to promote effective competition in the market can be reached by the Telecommunications Act "to safeguard the rights and interests of users " the ultimate goa