The research of legitimacy of construction contract clauses

[[abstract]]國內各機關依工程所需，分別頒佈各項契約範本，如公共工程委員會頒布的公共工程採購契約範本。公共工程在制式契約範本基礎下運作，工程爭議亦無減少之趨勢，其中是否為工程契約範本的條款對風險分配不均，亦或者對兩造雙方權利義務規定不完善，因而造成工程爭議情況不斷。 本研究以高等法院判決案例為主軸，建立工程爭議原因、契約條文及引用法律條文關係表，使爭議處理人員可以依照此關聯表，找尋該爭議相關契約條文及法律條文，做為爭議處理法理上的依據，提供相關人員掌握工程契約與法律條文之相關性。再運用契約條文與法律條文鏈結結果做分析，探究出契約條文爭議性及適法性，並提出契約條文修改建議及契約管理改善。 研究結果顯示，將契約條文與法律條文對照表中列舉出九項不符條款，並分析提出七項改善建議。而在契約條文爭議性探討中得知，爭議性最高條款為計價及工期之相關規定。[[abstract]]Institutions in Taiwan promulgate individually different contract models such as Treaties and Agreement on Government Procurement from Public Construction Commission of Executive Yuan Taiwan However there is no trend in diminishing disputes under foundations of exercising contract models of public construction Especially disproportionate risks allocations and flaw regulations on mutual rights and obligation cause disputes constantly This paper is based on judgments and precedents of high court and established a cross-reference table among dispute reasons contract clauses and legal clauses People who deal with construction disputes can search relative contract clauses and legal clauses as legal bases and control clauses correlation through the cross-reference table Then they can analyze linkages of contract clauses and legal clauses conclude the disputation and legitimacy and further propose suggestions for modifying contract clauses and amendments for clause management This research lists nine discrepant clauses from contract clauses and legal clauses and suggests seven improvements Besides through studying disputation of contract clauses we acknowledge that the highest disputation clause is relative regulations of valuation and timeframe of projec