Add to ORKGMany questions are left unanswered by the adoption of the discovery rule in Nebraska, but it is clear that the court intends to enlarge the opportunities for plaintiffs to obtain relief in malpractice cases. Whether the court intends to have the discovery rule supersede the end of treatment rule, or whether it intends to have them exist concurrently, will be clarified in later decisions. The concern shown by the court for the fair treatment of the injured patient makes it probable that the court will abandon any restriction of the discovery rule and apply it to all malpractice claims
Flanagan v. Mt. Eden Gen. Hosp., 24 N.Y.2d 427, 248 N.E.2d 871, 301 N.Y.S.2d 23 (1969)
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
In 1951, Nebraska adopted the principal parts of Rules 26 to 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...
Many questions are left unanswered by the adoption of the discovery rule in Nebraska, but it is clea...
IN OLIVER V. KAISER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION the Ohio Supreme Court adopted the discovery standar...
Traditionally, the period within which medical malpractice actions had to be commenced was computed ...
Generally, statutes of limitations run from the date of the alleged wrongful act. Because the avera...
A number of general legal problems have arisen out of malpractice actions and applicable statutes of...
The ill-treated patient has sought redress for medical malpractice by actions that sound in tort, in...
Each year in the United States, between 44,000 and 98,000 hospitalized patients die as a result of m...
It becomes apparent from an analysis of cases and law that many jurisdictions, when using the term m...
In the 1970s a crisis occurred in the medical malpractice insurance industry. As tort law began to f...
In Gaines v. Preterm Cleveland, Inc. the Ohio Supreme Court reversed prior law in two significant ar...
In an action for medical malpractice, the statute of limitations had been tolled by medical practiti...
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
Flanagan v. Mt. Eden Gen. Hosp., 24 N.Y.2d 427, 248 N.E.2d 871, 301 N.Y.S.2d 23 (1969)
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
In 1951, Nebraska adopted the principal parts of Rules 26 to 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...
Many questions are left unanswered by the adoption of the discovery rule in Nebraska, but it is clea...
IN OLIVER V. KAISER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION the Ohio Supreme Court adopted the discovery standar...
Traditionally, the period within which medical malpractice actions had to be commenced was computed ...
Generally, statutes of limitations run from the date of the alleged wrongful act. Because the avera...
A number of general legal problems have arisen out of malpractice actions and applicable statutes of...
The ill-treated patient has sought redress for medical malpractice by actions that sound in tort, in...
Each year in the United States, between 44,000 and 98,000 hospitalized patients die as a result of m...
It becomes apparent from an analysis of cases and law that many jurisdictions, when using the term m...
In the 1970s a crisis occurred in the medical malpractice insurance industry. As tort law began to f...
In Gaines v. Preterm Cleveland, Inc. the Ohio Supreme Court reversed prior law in two significant ar...
In an action for medical malpractice, the statute of limitations had been tolled by medical practiti...
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
Flanagan v. Mt. Eden Gen. Hosp., 24 N.Y.2d 427, 248 N.E.2d 871, 301 N.Y.S.2d 23 (1969)
Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would...
In 1951, Nebraska adopted the principal parts of Rules 26 to 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...