Add to ORKGThis Note discusses the concept of standing as it relates to the fulfillment of the purposes of the exclusionary rule. It also discusses the relationship of privacy and property interests as they are used by the Court to define the scope of fourth amendment protections. I. Introduction II. The Facts of Rakas III. Historical Background IV. Analysis of the Decision … A. The Fall of Standing … 1. Rejection of a Target Theory of Standing … 2. Demise of “Legitimate Presence” Test … B. “Reasonable Expectations” after Rakas V. The Concurrence and Dissent VI. A Recommended Solution VII. Conclusio
The United States Supreme Court has recently reevaluated its concept of standing for claims involvin...
Do citizens have any Fourth Amendment protection from sense-enhancing surveillance technologies in p...
Professor Doernberg examines a tension within fourth amendment jurisprudence and sugqests a means of...
This Note discusses the concept of standing as it relates to the fulfillment of the purposes of the ...
The initial inquiry a court must make before considering a motion to suppress evidence based on an u...
This article seeks for the very first time to inform that debate with a notion of property as an ess...
This Comment will discuss the issue that the Supreme Court of Connecticut declined to decide in Moon...
This Article considers the role of property rights in defining Fourth Amendment searches. Since Unit...
In its recent decision in United States v. Carlisle, the Seventh Circuit made clear that challenging...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
The authors examine the history of the standing doctrine as it relates to the ability to contest sea...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
This Article attempts at a minimum to offer a common background and frame of reference for defining ...
The Fourth Amendment was designed to be a barrier that protects citizens from unreasonable governmen...
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts hav...
The United States Supreme Court has recently reevaluated its concept of standing for claims involvin...
Do citizens have any Fourth Amendment protection from sense-enhancing surveillance technologies in p...
Professor Doernberg examines a tension within fourth amendment jurisprudence and sugqests a means of...
This Note discusses the concept of standing as it relates to the fulfillment of the purposes of the ...
The initial inquiry a court must make before considering a motion to suppress evidence based on an u...
This article seeks for the very first time to inform that debate with a notion of property as an ess...
This Comment will discuss the issue that the Supreme Court of Connecticut declined to decide in Moon...
This Article considers the role of property rights in defining Fourth Amendment searches. Since Unit...
In its recent decision in United States v. Carlisle, the Seventh Circuit made clear that challenging...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
The authors examine the history of the standing doctrine as it relates to the ability to contest sea...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
This Article attempts at a minimum to offer a common background and frame of reference for defining ...
The Fourth Amendment was designed to be a barrier that protects citizens from unreasonable governmen...
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts hav...
The United States Supreme Court has recently reevaluated its concept of standing for claims involvin...
Do citizens have any Fourth Amendment protection from sense-enhancing surveillance technologies in p...
Professor Doernberg examines a tension within fourth amendment jurisprudence and sugqests a means of...