This article attempts to analyse and investigate the implications of the approach to the applicability of Article XX GATT adopted in the recent China – Raw Materials. Using the decision on the non-availability of Article XX defences for violations of China’s WTO-plus commitments on export duties as a backdrop, it scrutinizes the more general, ‘systemic’ approach to the applicability of Article XX exceptions developed by theWTO dispute settlement bodies, and sheds light on the implications of such approach with respect to the relationship between GATT 1994 andWTO obligations arising from different instruments of theWTOAgreement, such as new members’ accession protocols. It also suggests that an exception to this general approach could be env...
This article is concerned with the ongoing debate on process and production methods (PPMs) and the e...
This article is concerned with the ongoing debate on process and production methods (PPMs) and the e...
When the general exceptions to the GATT have been invoked before the Appellate Body, they have only ...
On 30 January 2012, the Appellate Body handed down a long awaited ruling in the dispute brought by t...
On 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) established...
On 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) established...
On January 30, 2012 the Appellate Body to the World Trade Organization (WTO) released a decision in ...
In this article, Elisa Baroncini delves into the recent WTO AB ruling on the China – Raw Materials c...
The China—Rare Earths decision of the Appellate Body addressed two main issues: (i) whether China’s ...
On March 26, 2014, a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel issued its report on a dispute between the...
none1noOn 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) esta...
In 2014, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) adopted seven panel...
The United States, the European Union and Mexico alleged that China has acted inconsistently with it...
GATT Article XX plays the key role of determining when trade measures may be used. GATT/WTO panels h...
The failure to mention the relationship between China’s WTO-plus obligation in Paragraph 11.3 and th...
This article is concerned with the ongoing debate on process and production methods (PPMs) and the e...
This article is concerned with the ongoing debate on process and production methods (PPMs) and the e...
When the general exceptions to the GATT have been invoked before the Appellate Body, they have only ...
On 30 January 2012, the Appellate Body handed down a long awaited ruling in the dispute brought by t...
On 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) established...
On 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) established...
On January 30, 2012 the Appellate Body to the World Trade Organization (WTO) released a decision in ...
In this article, Elisa Baroncini delves into the recent WTO AB ruling on the China – Raw Materials c...
The China—Rare Earths decision of the Appellate Body addressed two main issues: (i) whether China’s ...
On March 26, 2014, a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel issued its report on a dispute between the...
none1noOn 23 July 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) esta...
In 2014, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) adopted seven panel...
The United States, the European Union and Mexico alleged that China has acted inconsistently with it...
GATT Article XX plays the key role of determining when trade measures may be used. GATT/WTO panels h...
The failure to mention the relationship between China’s WTO-plus obligation in Paragraph 11.3 and th...
This article is concerned with the ongoing debate on process and production methods (PPMs) and the e...
This article is concerned with the ongoing debate on process and production methods (PPMs) and the e...
When the general exceptions to the GATT have been invoked before the Appellate Body, they have only ...