Textbooks, across all disciplines, are prone to contain errors; grammatical, editorial, factual, or judgemental. The following is an account of one of the possible effects of such errors; how an error becomes entrenched and even exaggerated as later textbooks fail to correct the original error. The example considered here concerns the origins of one of the most basic and important tools of to day's medical research, the randomised controlled trial. It is the result of a systematic study of 26 British, French and German history of medicine textbooks since 1996
Change in clinical practice results mainly from positive randomized trials (superiority of tested me...
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Medical literature should consist of knowledge applicable to professional edu...
AbstractThe baseline standards for minimally acceptable science are improving as the understanding o...
This paper identifies major errors and myths perpetuated by educational research textbooks. The most...
A recently published AM Last Page presents five common methodological pitfalls of experimental resea...
It is over ten years now since Altman’s “cri du coeur ” – “The scandal of poor medical research” [1...
A medical myth is an aggressive defensive device used by orthodox medicine to retain the status quo ...
AbstractThe present study seeks to examine how basic knowledge presented in textbooks for the teachi...
The results of good randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in leading peer-reviewed journals ...
Medical literature should consist of knowledge applicable to professional education; nevertheless, t...
The history of medicine includes many errors. Some persisted for decades and caused great harm. Seve...
The Ruben and Kamen experiments (1941) in school text books Babacar Gueye Most biology textbooks o...
The history of medicine includes many errors. Some persisted for decades and caused great harm. Seve...
Objectives: To explore indicators of the following questionable research practices (QRPs) in randomi...
human subjects The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has explicitly promoted randomized resear...
Change in clinical practice results mainly from positive randomized trials (superiority of tested me...
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Medical literature should consist of knowledge applicable to professional edu...
AbstractThe baseline standards for minimally acceptable science are improving as the understanding o...
This paper identifies major errors and myths perpetuated by educational research textbooks. The most...
A recently published AM Last Page presents five common methodological pitfalls of experimental resea...
It is over ten years now since Altman’s “cri du coeur ” – “The scandal of poor medical research” [1...
A medical myth is an aggressive defensive device used by orthodox medicine to retain the status quo ...
AbstractThe present study seeks to examine how basic knowledge presented in textbooks for the teachi...
The results of good randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in leading peer-reviewed journals ...
Medical literature should consist of knowledge applicable to professional education; nevertheless, t...
The history of medicine includes many errors. Some persisted for decades and caused great harm. Seve...
The Ruben and Kamen experiments (1941) in school text books Babacar Gueye Most biology textbooks o...
The history of medicine includes many errors. Some persisted for decades and caused great harm. Seve...
Objectives: To explore indicators of the following questionable research practices (QRPs) in randomi...
human subjects The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has explicitly promoted randomized resear...
Change in clinical practice results mainly from positive randomized trials (superiority of tested me...
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Medical literature should consist of knowledge applicable to professional edu...
AbstractThe baseline standards for minimally acceptable science are improving as the understanding o...