Add to ORKGIn March 2017, CCSI submitted comments to the ICSID Secretariat regarding proposed revisions to ICSID’s arbitration rules. CCSI’s submission provided illustrative suggestions for amendments regarding the following issues: recognizing and safeguarding of the rights and interests of non-parties; improving transparency of the dispute resolution process; promoting transparency of ownership over investments; preventing actual and apparent conflicts of interest; addressing concerns raised by third-party funding; ensuring legitimacy of settlement agreements; and ensuring legitimacy of the rule revision process itself
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is currently working on how to r...
This note examines the consideration of amicus curiae briefs in international arbitration matters un...
The legitimacy of the World Bank\u27s dispute resolution body - The International Centre for the Set...
ICSID is amending its rules for resolving international investment disputes. This Perspective outlin...
In January 2017 CCSI made a submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, reg...
The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (hereinafter "ICSID") has started its...
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is currently working on how to r...
Problems related to ICSID jurisdiction are extremely relevant, and the mistakes made during the draf...
In the last decade, the Tribunals of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Dispu...
ICSID tribunals likely will need to address with greater frequency the fundamental issue of whether ...
The growing number of investment disputes indicates more challenging and controversial matters in th...
This Article shows that the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (ICSID) curr...
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) is an autonomous international ins...
The Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI) is grateful for the opportunity to provide inpu...
Globalization has increased international investment activity, but no unified legal framework govern...
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is currently working on how to r...
This note examines the consideration of amicus curiae briefs in international arbitration matters un...
The legitimacy of the World Bank\u27s dispute resolution body - The International Centre for the Set...
ICSID is amending its rules for resolving international investment disputes. This Perspective outlin...
In January 2017 CCSI made a submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, reg...
The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (hereinafter "ICSID") has started its...
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is currently working on how to r...
Problems related to ICSID jurisdiction are extremely relevant, and the mistakes made during the draf...
In the last decade, the Tribunals of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Dispu...
ICSID tribunals likely will need to address with greater frequency the fundamental issue of whether ...
The growing number of investment disputes indicates more challenging and controversial matters in th...
This Article shows that the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (ICSID) curr...
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) is an autonomous international ins...
The Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI) is grateful for the opportunity to provide inpu...
Globalization has increased international investment activity, but no unified legal framework govern...
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is currently working on how to r...
This note examines the consideration of amicus curiae briefs in international arbitration matters un...
The legitimacy of the World Bank\u27s dispute resolution body - The International Centre for the Set...