Abstract: Interactive theorem provers have developed dramatically over the past four decades, from primitive beginnings to today’s powerful systems. Here, we focus on Isabelle/HOL and its distinctive strengths. They include automatic proof search, borrowing techniques from the world of first order theorem proving, but also the automatic search for counterexamples. They include a highly readable structured language of proofs and a unique interactive development environment for editing live proof documents. Everything rests on the foundation conceived by Robin Milner for Edinburgh LCF: a proof kernel, using abstract types to ensure soundness and eliminate the need to store proofs. Compared with the research prototypes of the 1970s, Isabelle i...
Introduction The Isabelle/HOL environment [8] combines the power of au-tomated reasoning with higher...
Abstract. We propose a synthesis of the two proof styles of interactive theorem proving: the procedu...
The Isabelle/PIDE platform addresses the question whether proof assistants of the LCF family are sui...
Interactive theorem provers have developed dramatically over the past four decades, from primitive b...
Abstract. Interactive Theorem Provers have a long tradition, going back to the 1970s when interactio...
Abstract. Proof assistants in the LCF tradition, such as Coq, Isabelle, and the HOL family, are noto...
This paper describes the core of an interactive theorem prover, "HOL Light", and a derivat...
Isabelle/HOL is a generic proof assistant. Using Isabelle/HOL requires insight into procedures as we...
This paper describes the integration of a leading SAT solver with Isabelle/HOL, a popular interactiv...
Abstract: This is an account of a mathematician’s first experiences with the proof assistant (intera...
International audienceIsaFoL (Isabelle Formalization of Logic) is an undertaking that aims at develo...
The Isabelle/PIDE platform addresses the question whether proof assistants of the LCF family are sui...
. There is an overwhelming number of different proof tools available and it is hard to find the righ...
Interactive theorem provers require too much effort from their users. We have been developing a syst...
AbstractInteractive theorem provers require too much effort from their users. We have been developin...
Introduction The Isabelle/HOL environment [8] combines the power of au-tomated reasoning with higher...
Abstract. We propose a synthesis of the two proof styles of interactive theorem proving: the procedu...
The Isabelle/PIDE platform addresses the question whether proof assistants of the LCF family are sui...
Interactive theorem provers have developed dramatically over the past four decades, from primitive b...
Abstract. Interactive Theorem Provers have a long tradition, going back to the 1970s when interactio...
Abstract. Proof assistants in the LCF tradition, such as Coq, Isabelle, and the HOL family, are noto...
This paper describes the core of an interactive theorem prover, "HOL Light", and a derivat...
Isabelle/HOL is a generic proof assistant. Using Isabelle/HOL requires insight into procedures as we...
This paper describes the integration of a leading SAT solver with Isabelle/HOL, a popular interactiv...
Abstract: This is an account of a mathematician’s first experiences with the proof assistant (intera...
International audienceIsaFoL (Isabelle Formalization of Logic) is an undertaking that aims at develo...
The Isabelle/PIDE platform addresses the question whether proof assistants of the LCF family are sui...
. There is an overwhelming number of different proof tools available and it is hard to find the righ...
Interactive theorem provers require too much effort from their users. We have been developing a syst...
AbstractInteractive theorem provers require too much effort from their users. We have been developin...
Introduction The Isabelle/HOL environment [8] combines the power of au-tomated reasoning with higher...
Abstract. We propose a synthesis of the two proof styles of interactive theorem proving: the procedu...
The Isabelle/PIDE platform addresses the question whether proof assistants of the LCF family are sui...