This is a short letter on how the peer review process of many journals is being abused by some sham authors. While it would be difficult for the journals to identify and eliminate manuscripts that are not submitted with a sincere intention to publish, the universities and learning institutions should develop code of ethics to prevent their staff from abusing the journal review process. Imposing submission fee would also act as a deterrent against unscrupulous submissions
Abstract—After a short overview of arguments pro and contra peer reviews, examples of gross misjudge...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
Peer review is regarded as a central pillar of academic publishing, acting as a filter for readers, ...
This is a short letter on how the peer review process of many journals is being abused by some sham ...
LETTER: To the Editor, In recent years, many questionable journals have appeared and their num...
LETTER: To the Editor, In recent years, many questionable journals have appeared and their num...
LETTER: To the Editor, In recent years, many questionable journals have appeared and their num...
Peer review continues to be upheld as the best way to evaluate academic research ahead of publicatio...
ABSTRACT Many journals and publishers employ online submission systems (OSSs) to process manuscripts...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Many journals and publishers employ online submission systems (OSSs) to process manuscripts. In some...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Abstract—After a short overview of arguments pro and contra peer reviews, examples of gross misjudge...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
Peer review is regarded as a central pillar of academic publishing, acting as a filter for readers, ...
This is a short letter on how the peer review process of many journals is being abused by some sham ...
LETTER: To the Editor, In recent years, many questionable journals have appeared and their num...
LETTER: To the Editor, In recent years, many questionable journals have appeared and their num...
LETTER: To the Editor, In recent years, many questionable journals have appeared and their num...
Peer review continues to be upheld as the best way to evaluate academic research ahead of publicatio...
ABSTRACT Many journals and publishers employ online submission systems (OSSs) to process manuscripts...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Many journals and publishers employ online submission systems (OSSs) to process manuscripts. In some...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Abstract—After a short overview of arguments pro and contra peer reviews, examples of gross misjudge...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
Peer review is regarded as a central pillar of academic publishing, acting as a filter for readers, ...