We introduce techniques for proving superlinear conditional lower bounds for polynomial time problems. In particular, we show that CircuitSAT for circuits with m gates and log(m) inputs (denoted by log-CircuitSAT) is not decidable in essentially-linear time unless the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) is false and k-Clique is decidable in essentially-linear time in terms of the graph's size for all fixed k. Such conditional lower bounds have previously only been demonstrated relative to the strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH). Our results therefore offer significant progress towards proving unconditional superlinear time complexity lower bounds for natural problems in polynomial time.Comment: Accepted at STACS 202
We make several improvements on time lower bounds for concrete problems in NP and PH. 1. We present ...
We show conditional lower bounds for well-studied #P-hard problems: -The number of satisfying assign...
We reduce non-deterministic time T ≥ 2n to a 3SAT instance φ of quasilinear size |φ | = T · logO(1)...
We introduce techniques for proving superlinear conditional lower bounds for polynomial time problem...
We introduce techniques for proving superlinear conditional lower bounds for polynomial time problem...
Andras Z. Salamon acknowledges support from EPSRC grants EP/P015638/1 and EP/V027182/1.We introduce ...
The 1980’s was a golden period for Boolean circuit complexity lower bounds. There were major breakth...
In this article we survey algorithmic lower bound results that have been obtained in the field of ex...
We consider the problem of proving circuit lower bounds against the polynomialtime hierarchy. We giv...
We consider the problem of proving circuit lower bounds against the polynomialtime hierarchy. We giv...
The 1980's was a golden period for Boolean circuit complexity lower bounds. There were major br...
We ask for feasibly constructive proofs of known circuit lower bounds for explicit functions on bit ...
The quest for fast exact exponential-time algorithms and fast parameterized algorithms for NP-hard p...
The quest for fast exact exponential-time algorithms and fast parameterized al-gorithms for NP-hard ...
We reduce non-deterministic time T ≥ 2 n to a 3SAT instance φ of quasilinear size |φ | = T ·log O(1...
We make several improvements on time lower bounds for concrete problems in NP and PH. 1. We present ...
We show conditional lower bounds for well-studied #P-hard problems: -The number of satisfying assign...
We reduce non-deterministic time T ≥ 2n to a 3SAT instance φ of quasilinear size |φ | = T · logO(1)...
We introduce techniques for proving superlinear conditional lower bounds for polynomial time problem...
We introduce techniques for proving superlinear conditional lower bounds for polynomial time problem...
Andras Z. Salamon acknowledges support from EPSRC grants EP/P015638/1 and EP/V027182/1.We introduce ...
The 1980’s was a golden period for Boolean circuit complexity lower bounds. There were major breakth...
In this article we survey algorithmic lower bound results that have been obtained in the field of ex...
We consider the problem of proving circuit lower bounds against the polynomialtime hierarchy. We giv...
We consider the problem of proving circuit lower bounds against the polynomialtime hierarchy. We giv...
The 1980's was a golden period for Boolean circuit complexity lower bounds. There were major br...
We ask for feasibly constructive proofs of known circuit lower bounds for explicit functions on bit ...
The quest for fast exact exponential-time algorithms and fast parameterized algorithms for NP-hard p...
The quest for fast exact exponential-time algorithms and fast parameterized al-gorithms for NP-hard ...
We reduce non-deterministic time T ≥ 2 n to a 3SAT instance φ of quasilinear size |φ | = T ·log O(1...
We make several improvements on time lower bounds for concrete problems in NP and PH. 1. We present ...
We show conditional lower bounds for well-studied #P-hard problems: -The number of satisfying assign...
We reduce non-deterministic time T ≥ 2n to a 3SAT instance φ of quasilinear size |φ | = T · logO(1)...