Add to ORKGThis Recent Development argues that no single federal common law rule of contribution exists and that federal securities law decisions provide the best analogy from which to imply a right of contribution under the antitrust laws. Thus, the Recent Development proposes that the Supreme Court should fashion a rule permitting contribution among antitrust defendants
Few fields of law have experienced a more dramatic pace of development in recent years than has that...
In 1970, a district court observed: We must confess at the outset that we find antitrust standing c...
Journal ArticleJustice SPENCER delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a treble damage action u...
This Note examines the contribution controversy from an antitrust policy perspective. Part I summari...
The United States Supreme Court recently has agreed to consider the issue of whether contribution am...
It is not uncommon today for a single securities case to include several cross-claims or third-party...
The author analyzes the conceptual bases of two rules applied in antitrust litigation: the first all...
Antitrust law condemns price-fixing cartels and seeks to encourage private suits against the conspir...
This paper discusses the theory and experience of United States courts concerning the quantification...
In Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., the Nebraska Supreme Court was presented with...
Contribution is the right of a tort-feasor who has paid an injured plaintiff to obtain partial reimb...
Recent decisions of the Florida district courts of appeal have engrafted inconsistent requirements o...
This Article will show that antitrust violations do not actually give rise to treble damages. When...
In Misuse of the Antitrust Laws: The Competitor Plaintiff, Edward Snyder and Thomas Kauper survey a ...
Antitrust has a complex set of criminal and civil remedies enforced by a multiplicity of public and ...
Few fields of law have experienced a more dramatic pace of development in recent years than has that...
In 1970, a district court observed: We must confess at the outset that we find antitrust standing c...
Journal ArticleJustice SPENCER delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a treble damage action u...
This Note examines the contribution controversy from an antitrust policy perspective. Part I summari...
The United States Supreme Court recently has agreed to consider the issue of whether contribution am...
It is not uncommon today for a single securities case to include several cross-claims or third-party...
The author analyzes the conceptual bases of two rules applied in antitrust litigation: the first all...
Antitrust law condemns price-fixing cartels and seeks to encourage private suits against the conspir...
This paper discusses the theory and experience of United States courts concerning the quantification...
In Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., the Nebraska Supreme Court was presented with...
Contribution is the right of a tort-feasor who has paid an injured plaintiff to obtain partial reimb...
Recent decisions of the Florida district courts of appeal have engrafted inconsistent requirements o...
This Article will show that antitrust violations do not actually give rise to treble damages. When...
In Misuse of the Antitrust Laws: The Competitor Plaintiff, Edward Snyder and Thomas Kauper survey a ...
Antitrust has a complex set of criminal and civil remedies enforced by a multiplicity of public and ...
Few fields of law have experienced a more dramatic pace of development in recent years than has that...
In 1970, a district court observed: We must confess at the outset that we find antitrust standing c...
Journal ArticleJustice SPENCER delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a treble damage action u...