Add to ORKGThe High Court's recent rights jurisprudence has been unusually controversial. This paper argues that it is possible to evaluate the important developments in the Court's jurisprudence by examining the philosophical foundations of its understanding of rights
Chapter 4.1 Stellios (‘Australian constitutionalism and the UK-style dialogue model of human rights ...
In Australia, discussion of Bills of Rights has tended to focus on the human rights statutes adopted...
This thesis examines the possibilities for building a reconciliatory jurisprudence for the protectio...
This paper interrogates the sense that Australian law becomes (or might become) more ‘progressive’ a...
The High Court's role of judicial review has often been examined for its impact on rights protection...
grantor: University of TorontoThe dissertation relies on the different theoretical foundat...
Australian courts - and the High Court in particular - are another political institution (Chapter 2)...
This book examines the judicialization of politics in the High Court of Australia. The authors argue...
This paper provides a systematic legal and cultural overview of the reasons behind the opposition to...
The framers of the Australian Constitution entrenched the principle of separation of powers—specific...
This article traces the evolution in Australia of fundamental rights protection provided by the cour...
Recent rulings by North American Supreme Courts have shown the increasingly influential role of Supr...
The current human rights debate in Australia is a long-standing one, in the context of one of the fe...
This chapter explains how the High Court under former Chief Justice Mason in the early 1990s was wro...
"The thesis of this dissertation is that the Gleeson High Court is a largely a-theoretical Court, in...
Chapter 4.1 Stellios (‘Australian constitutionalism and the UK-style dialogue model of human rights ...
In Australia, discussion of Bills of Rights has tended to focus on the human rights statutes adopted...
This thesis examines the possibilities for building a reconciliatory jurisprudence for the protectio...
This paper interrogates the sense that Australian law becomes (or might become) more ‘progressive’ a...
The High Court's role of judicial review has often been examined for its impact on rights protection...
grantor: University of TorontoThe dissertation relies on the different theoretical foundat...
Australian courts - and the High Court in particular - are another political institution (Chapter 2)...
This book examines the judicialization of politics in the High Court of Australia. The authors argue...
This paper provides a systematic legal and cultural overview of the reasons behind the opposition to...
The framers of the Australian Constitution entrenched the principle of separation of powers—specific...
This article traces the evolution in Australia of fundamental rights protection provided by the cour...
Recent rulings by North American Supreme Courts have shown the increasingly influential role of Supr...
The current human rights debate in Australia is a long-standing one, in the context of one of the fe...
This chapter explains how the High Court under former Chief Justice Mason in the early 1990s was wro...
"The thesis of this dissertation is that the Gleeson High Court is a largely a-theoretical Court, in...
Chapter 4.1 Stellios (‘Australian constitutionalism and the UK-style dialogue model of human rights ...
In Australia, discussion of Bills of Rights has tended to focus on the human rights statutes adopted...
This thesis examines the possibilities for building a reconciliatory jurisprudence for the protectio...