The criminalization of consensual sexual acts between children

Sections 15 and 16 of the Criminal Law Sexual Offences and Related Matters Act (hereinafter referred to as “SORMA”) regulated consensual sexual acts between children. Both these sections criminalised consensual sexual acts between children. Section 15 of SORMA deals with consensual sexual penetration with children 12 years old but under the age of 16 years and section 16 deals with acts of consensual sexual violation with children 12 years of age but under the age of 16. The aim of these two sections was to protect children from undue influence relating to sexual engagement with adults or significantly older children. A number of child organisations criticised sections 15 and 16 on grounds that it is not abnormal for adolescents in the age group 12 to 16 years to experiment with sex and that such conduct are developmentally significant and normative. In the Teddy Bear Clinic and Rapcan v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development1 (hereinafter referred to as the Teddy Bear case), the constitutionality of sections 15 and 16 of SORMA were challenged in the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court held that both sections were unconstitutional and ruled that these sections violated childrens’ right to human dignity, privacy and the best interest of the child principle. The Constitutional Court suspended the declaration of invalidity for a period of 18 months in order to give Parliament an opportunity to remedy the defects in SORMA. On 3 July 2015 the Criminal Law Sexual Offences and Related Matters Amendment, Amendment 5 of 2015, came into operation and amended section 15 and 16 by decriminalising sexual acts between children aged between 12 to 15 years. This research evaluates the arguments and effects of the Teddy Bear case with reference to section 15 and 16 of SORMA and provides an analysis of the current amendments in the Amendment Act 5 2015, with specific reference to its impact on consensual sexual acts between children