Substantive fairness in dismissals based on operational requirements

This treatise interrogates the concept of substantive fairness in dismissals based on operational requirements and commences with the background and rationale to the study. It intends to achieve by virtue of specific research questions identified in the first chapter. The second chapter focuses on a discussion defining the term operational requirements and the circumstances in which employers have sought to justify dismissals based on operational requirements together with the courts’ interpretation of the term. Following an in-depth look at the South African courts’ interpretation of operational requirements, the third chapter analyses the jurisprudential development of the law of substantive fairness and assesses how the courts have applied statutory provisions relevant to operational requirement dismissals. The third chapter is then followed by a discussion on the aspects relating to selection criteria as pronounced by South African labour-law jurisprudence and deals specifically with the concept of LIFO and the employment universe. The fourth chapter also raises the various forms of fair and objective selection criteria, as well as the concept of bumping in light of the Employment Equity Act. The final chapter concludes that the primary areas requiring reform relate to the test for substantive fairness that does not include a proportionality analysis to weigh up the competing interests of the employer and the employees. The treatise further concludes with recommendations in dealing with dismissals based on operational requirements