Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court has held that federal courts must abstain from intervention into pending state proceedings under the Younger doctrine when the federal plaintiff has an available state court opportunity to raise his federal constitutional claim. Moore v. Sims, 99 S. Ct. 2371 (1979
For decades federal courts have remained mostly off limits to civil rights cases challenging the con...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a Texas statute which precludes paternity suits from b...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Younger abstention doctri...
The Supreme Court held that federal judicial abstention may be inappropriate where violation of firs...
In 1940 defendant, a state judge, granted an ex parte order transferring plaintiff, then a voluntary...
The American judicial system is founded on several policies which act as guideposts for the courts. ...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that the court ne...
The Younger abstention doctrine limits the ability of a federal court to enjoin a pending state proc...
In the fall of 1970, plaintiff Richard Steffel participated in the distribution of anti-war leaflets...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the first and fourteenth amendments to the Constitutio...
The recent United States Supreme Court decision of Younger v. Harris along with its companion cases ...
During the period covered by this survey, most of the constitutional law and civil rights cases cons...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) was enacted\u27 to curtail the Ku Klux Klan\u27s terrorist activities in the Sou...
For decades federal courts have remained mostly off limits to civil rights cases challenging the con...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a Texas statute which precludes paternity suits from b...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Younger abstention doctri...
The Supreme Court held that federal judicial abstention may be inappropriate where violation of firs...
In 1940 defendant, a state judge, granted an ex parte order transferring plaintiff, then a voluntary...
The American judicial system is founded on several policies which act as guideposts for the courts. ...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that the court ne...
The Younger abstention doctrine limits the ability of a federal court to enjoin a pending state proc...
In the fall of 1970, plaintiff Richard Steffel participated in the distribution of anti-war leaflets...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the first and fourteenth amendments to the Constitutio...
The recent United States Supreme Court decision of Younger v. Harris along with its companion cases ...
During the period covered by this survey, most of the constitutional law and civil rights cases cons...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) was enacted\u27 to curtail the Ku Klux Klan\u27s terrorist activities in the Sou...
For decades federal courts have remained mostly off limits to civil rights cases challenging the con...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a Texas statute which precludes paternity suits from b...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...