Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court of the United States has held that foreign nations are entitled to sue for treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act. Pfizer, Inc. v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308 (1978)
Plaintiffs brought a treble damage action under section 4 of the Clayton Act alleging violations by ...
After summarizing the rationale behind Pfizer, this article will trace the ramifications of the deci...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...
This Note will show that the Court\u27s opinion should be liberally construed, thereby granting fore...
The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices...
Section 7 of the Sherman Act, as amended by section 4 of the Clayton Act, gives a private right of a...
May the respondents, five foreign companies that purchased goods outside the United States from othe...
Section 5(b) of the Clayton Act, which provides for suspension of the applicable statute of limitati...
This topic is a constellation of antitrust highlights. Within the past five years the Federal Trade ...
This comment will approach section 7 relief questions and solutions primarily in the light of du Pon...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the pass-on theory may not be used offensively ...
Although the primary responsibility for the enforcement of the antitrust laws falls upon governmenta...
In a civil action for treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, the plaintiff sought to all...
This recent case discusses Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. (7th Cir. 1967)
Plaintiffs, corporate distributors, sought treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, allegi...
Plaintiffs brought a treble damage action under section 4 of the Clayton Act alleging violations by ...
After summarizing the rationale behind Pfizer, this article will trace the ramifications of the deci...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...
This Note will show that the Court\u27s opinion should be liberally construed, thereby granting fore...
The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices...
Section 7 of the Sherman Act, as amended by section 4 of the Clayton Act, gives a private right of a...
May the respondents, five foreign companies that purchased goods outside the United States from othe...
Section 5(b) of the Clayton Act, which provides for suspension of the applicable statute of limitati...
This topic is a constellation of antitrust highlights. Within the past five years the Federal Trade ...
This comment will approach section 7 relief questions and solutions primarily in the light of du Pon...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the pass-on theory may not be used offensively ...
Although the primary responsibility for the enforcement of the antitrust laws falls upon governmenta...
In a civil action for treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, the plaintiff sought to all...
This recent case discusses Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. (7th Cir. 1967)
Plaintiffs, corporate distributors, sought treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, allegi...
Plaintiffs brought a treble damage action under section 4 of the Clayton Act alleging violations by ...
After summarizing the rationale behind Pfizer, this article will trace the ramifications of the deci...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...