Add to ORKGThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held statutory provisions requiring the resentencing of finalized marijuana convictions to be unconstitutional interferences with final judicial judgments. Commonwealth v. Sutley, 378 A.2d 780 (Pa. 1977)
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that Article I, Section 9, of the Pennsylvania Constitution is n...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that even if the lower court denies defendants their confront...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
In Scott v. United States the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that established principles gover...
The Pennsylvania Reapportionment Act held unconstitutional. Butcher v. Bloom, 415 Pa. 438, 203 A. 2d...
The Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York has held that O\u27Callahan v. Parke...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided that the Commonwealth must appeal every final order of a ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a retroactive application of the equitable distribution...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the judicial branch has inherent power to determine rea...
In affirming convictions pursuant to a Texas statute implementing common law recidivist procedure, t...
Johnson v. United States held that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that judicial resignation does not foreclose the supreme cou...
Pennsylvania statute that authorizes a jury to impose costs on an acquitted misdemeanor defendant an...
Pennsylvania has abrogated the prematurity doctrine. Commonwealth ex rel. Stevens v. Myers, 419 Pa....
This article analyzes the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s recidivist mandatory sentencing pro...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that Article I, Section 9, of the Pennsylvania Constitution is n...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that even if the lower court denies defendants their confront...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
In Scott v. United States the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that established principles gover...
The Pennsylvania Reapportionment Act held unconstitutional. Butcher v. Bloom, 415 Pa. 438, 203 A. 2d...
The Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York has held that O\u27Callahan v. Parke...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided that the Commonwealth must appeal every final order of a ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a retroactive application of the equitable distribution...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the judicial branch has inherent power to determine rea...
In affirming convictions pursuant to a Texas statute implementing common law recidivist procedure, t...
Johnson v. United States held that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that judicial resignation does not foreclose the supreme cou...
Pennsylvania statute that authorizes a jury to impose costs on an acquitted misdemeanor defendant an...
Pennsylvania has abrogated the prematurity doctrine. Commonwealth ex rel. Stevens v. Myers, 419 Pa....
This article analyzes the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s recidivist mandatory sentencing pro...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that Article I, Section 9, of the Pennsylvania Constitution is n...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that even if the lower court denies defendants their confront...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...