Add to ORKGThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that under Pennsylvania law, in cases involving solely consequential damages without actual physical harm to person or property, an injured party\u27s remedy is under the Uniform Commercial Code and section 402A of the Second Restatement of Torts is inapplicable. Posttape Associates v. Eastman Kodak Co., 537 F.2d 751 (3d Cir. 1976)
An unusual type of products liability case raises the issue of whether an injured consumer can recov...
Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts forever changed the means by which an individual w...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted the Restatement 2d, Torts, Section 400, which provides th...
Consequential damages can easily amount to millions of dollars. Commercial parties often disclaim co...
Willard Van Dyke Prods. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 12 N.Y.2d 301, 189 N.E.2d 693, 239 N.Y.S.2d 337 (1963)
Barker v. Allied Supermarket, 20 UCC Rptr. 6 (Okla. Ct. App. 1976) In 1974, the Oklahoma Supreme Cou...
After outlining the subsections of section 2-719 of the Uniform Commercial Code and suggesting a met...
The final part of this five-part article, resuming with section 2-701, Remedies for Breach of Collat...
In recent years, there has been considerable development in the law governing liability of a seller ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania split on the question of when the Deficiency Judgment Act places a...
Statutes of limitation are statutes of repose, the object of which is to compel the exercise of a ri...
Professor Wertheimer has proposed that courts be allowed to hold producers strictly liable for produ...
This Note argues that if a seller and a commercial buyer are in privity, damage to a product resulti...
This article will describe the varying approaches that courts use to decide whether clauses limiting...
An unusual type of products liability case raises the issue of whether an injured consumer can recov...
Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts forever changed the means by which an individual w...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted the Restatement 2d, Torts, Section 400, which provides th...
Consequential damages can easily amount to millions of dollars. Commercial parties often disclaim co...
Willard Van Dyke Prods. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 12 N.Y.2d 301, 189 N.E.2d 693, 239 N.Y.S.2d 337 (1963)
Barker v. Allied Supermarket, 20 UCC Rptr. 6 (Okla. Ct. App. 1976) In 1974, the Oklahoma Supreme Cou...
After outlining the subsections of section 2-719 of the Uniform Commercial Code and suggesting a met...
The final part of this five-part article, resuming with section 2-701, Remedies for Breach of Collat...
In recent years, there has been considerable development in the law governing liability of a seller ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania split on the question of when the Deficiency Judgment Act places a...
Statutes of limitation are statutes of repose, the object of which is to compel the exercise of a ri...
Professor Wertheimer has proposed that courts be allowed to hold producers strictly liable for produ...
This Note argues that if a seller and a commercial buyer are in privity, damage to a product resulti...
This article will describe the varying approaches that courts use to decide whether clauses limiting...
An unusual type of products liability case raises the issue of whether an injured consumer can recov...
Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts forever changed the means by which an individual w...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...