Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court has held that California\u27s disenfranchisement of convicted felons who have completed their sentences and paroles did not violate the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. Richardson v. Ramirez, 94 S. Ct. 2655 (1974)
The United States Supreme Court has held that a provision of the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act,...
Appellant, a male, was convicted in a Louisiana state court of aggravated kidnapping. Prior to his t...
The United States Supreme Court has held the regulations of the California Department of Alcoholic B...
Individuals convicted of a felony lose the right to vote at least temporarily in most states, and ex...
Discusses the case in the 2004-05 U.S. Supreme Court Term which decided a constitutional challenge t...
Defendant-appellant was charged with violation of a Los Angeles municipal ordinance which required a...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a parolee\u27s liberty involves significant values wit...
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 invalidates voting qualifications that deny the right to ...
When defendant Leon Jones was arrested, he moved to be transferred to the district where the crimes ...
Constitutional Law/Access to Courts-LIMITING THE RELIEF AVAILABLE TO INDIGENT DEATH ROW INMATES DENI...
This article explores state felon disenfranchisement laws and proposes a new way for felons to chall...
Every defendant facing criminal prosecution that may result in imprisonment is guaranteed the right ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent both a showing of cause for failure to make a t...
State policies which disenfranchise ex-felons, those who have served their complete sentences, have ...
In the last thirty years, the equal protection clause has been largely transformed. Once a point of ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a provision of the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act,...
Appellant, a male, was convicted in a Louisiana state court of aggravated kidnapping. Prior to his t...
The United States Supreme Court has held the regulations of the California Department of Alcoholic B...
Individuals convicted of a felony lose the right to vote at least temporarily in most states, and ex...
Discusses the case in the 2004-05 U.S. Supreme Court Term which decided a constitutional challenge t...
Defendant-appellant was charged with violation of a Los Angeles municipal ordinance which required a...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a parolee\u27s liberty involves significant values wit...
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 invalidates voting qualifications that deny the right to ...
When defendant Leon Jones was arrested, he moved to be transferred to the district where the crimes ...
Constitutional Law/Access to Courts-LIMITING THE RELIEF AVAILABLE TO INDIGENT DEATH ROW INMATES DENI...
This article explores state felon disenfranchisement laws and proposes a new way for felons to chall...
Every defendant facing criminal prosecution that may result in imprisonment is guaranteed the right ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent both a showing of cause for failure to make a t...
State policies which disenfranchise ex-felons, those who have served their complete sentences, have ...
In the last thirty years, the equal protection clause has been largely transformed. Once a point of ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a provision of the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act,...
Appellant, a male, was convicted in a Louisiana state court of aggravated kidnapping. Prior to his t...
The United States Supreme Court has held the regulations of the California Department of Alcoholic B...