Add to ORKGThe United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that the court need not abstain from approving a consent agreement between the Commonwealth and the Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children, although the statutes challenged under the equal protection clause and under state law were unclear. The Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that federal habeas corpus is not ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a court must examine the strength of the existing emotio...
The landmark decision of Brown v. Board of Education held that the equal protection clause of the fo...
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s voluntary admi...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The United States Supreme Court has held that federal courts must abstain from intervention into pen...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania statute allowing courts to order noncustodia...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that federal and Pennsylvania stat...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that child placement agreements voluntarily executed by p...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Younger abstention doctri...
In response to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court\u27s decision in Blue v. Blue, Pennsylvania\u27s Gener...
In response to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court\u27s decision in Blue v. Blue, Pennsylvania\u27s Gener...
The American judicial system is founded on several policies which act as guideposts for the courts. ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a profoundly retarded child h...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a public school student threatened with suspens...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that federal habeas corpus is not ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a court must examine the strength of the existing emotio...
The landmark decision of Brown v. Board of Education held that the equal protection clause of the fo...
The United States Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania\u27s voluntary admi...
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has held that a juvenile i...
The United States Supreme Court has held that federal courts must abstain from intervention into pen...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania statute allowing courts to order noncustodia...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that federal and Pennsylvania stat...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that child placement agreements voluntarily executed by p...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Younger abstention doctri...
In response to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court\u27s decision in Blue v. Blue, Pennsylvania\u27s Gener...
In response to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court\u27s decision in Blue v. Blue, Pennsylvania\u27s Gener...
The American judicial system is founded on several policies which act as guideposts for the courts. ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that a profoundly retarded child h...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a public school student threatened with suspens...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that federal habeas corpus is not ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a court must examine the strength of the existing emotio...
The landmark decision of Brown v. Board of Education held that the equal protection clause of the fo...