Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court has held that the speech or debate clause applies to congressional aides, insofar as the aides conduct would be a protected legislative act if performed by the Member himself; but it does not extend immunity to the Member\u27s aide when testifying before a grand jury about acts done by the Member or himself, if such inquiry does not impinge upon the legislative process, and proves relevant to investigating possible third party crimes. Gravel v. United States, 408 U.S. 606 (1972)
This Comment provides a guide to the current constitutional framework concerning in-court compelled ...
This Comment provides a guide to the current constitutional framework concerning in-court compelled ...
Use of defendant\u27s incriminating statements, surreptitiously procured by government agents after ...
An increasing number of America’s most contentious issues will be resolved in state legislatures. Co...
The United States Supreme Court has held that use and derivative use immunity is coextensive with th...
The passage in August, 1954 of a federal statute granting immunity under specified conditions to wit...
Defendant, a witness called by the New Hampshire attorney general in an investigation of subversive ...
Gravel v. United States, which arose out of Senator Mike Gravel\u27s attempt to publicize the Pentag...
The Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution states that for any Speech or Debate in either Hous...
The Supreme Court has held that a grand jury witness offered immunity is not entitled to a suppressi...
This Note has outlined various constitutional arguments that the criminal defendant can invoke in su...
Use of defendant\u27s incriminating statements, surreptitiously procured by government agents after ...
The Speech or Debate Clause encompasses certain privileges that inure to the benefit of legislators....
ln response to a summons, petitioner appeared to testify before a congressional committee investigat...
Besides the two specific problems which the new federal act presents, namely, whether it imposes non...
This Comment provides a guide to the current constitutional framework concerning in-court compelled ...
This Comment provides a guide to the current constitutional framework concerning in-court compelled ...
Use of defendant\u27s incriminating statements, surreptitiously procured by government agents after ...
An increasing number of America’s most contentious issues will be resolved in state legislatures. Co...
The United States Supreme Court has held that use and derivative use immunity is coextensive with th...
The passage in August, 1954 of a federal statute granting immunity under specified conditions to wit...
Defendant, a witness called by the New Hampshire attorney general in an investigation of subversive ...
Gravel v. United States, which arose out of Senator Mike Gravel\u27s attempt to publicize the Pentag...
The Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution states that for any Speech or Debate in either Hous...
The Supreme Court has held that a grand jury witness offered immunity is not entitled to a suppressi...
This Note has outlined various constitutional arguments that the criminal defendant can invoke in su...
Use of defendant\u27s incriminating statements, surreptitiously procured by government agents after ...
The Speech or Debate Clause encompasses certain privileges that inure to the benefit of legislators....
ln response to a summons, petitioner appeared to testify before a congressional committee investigat...
Besides the two specific problems which the new federal act presents, namely, whether it imposes non...
This Comment provides a guide to the current constitutional framework concerning in-court compelled ...
This Comment provides a guide to the current constitutional framework concerning in-court compelled ...
Use of defendant\u27s incriminating statements, surreptitiously procured by government agents after ...