The Court of Appeals of Washington has held that liability for damages against a municipality must be predicated upon the tortious conduct of the municipality, and that the good faith enactment of an ordinance is a legislative act which cannot be characterized as tortious, no matter how mistaken or unwise the municipality\u27s legislative action may have been. J.S.K. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lacey, 6 Wash. App. 43, 492 P.2d 600 (1972)
Plaintiff sued the Town of Cocoa Beach for damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband. Pl...
Plaintiffs sought damages from the State of Washington for property destroyed by a juvenile escapee ...
The Ohio Supreme Court continued in 1983 to expand and define its abrogation of the doctrine of sove...
Plaintiff\u27s decedent was killed by a fall down the elevator shaft of a building owned and maintai...
The Supreme Court of Nebraska has assumed an active role in eliminating governmental tort immunity b...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Monroe v. Pape excluding municipalities as proper defendants in a...
There is hardly a legal doctrine so universally criticized as municipal tort immunity, which is at t...
The United States Supreme Court has held that municipalities sued for civil rights violations under ...
For most of this century, states and municipalities were immune from liability for anticompetitive a...
The doctrine of governmental immunity from tort liability historically stems from the concept that ...
Actions alleging municipal tort liability for negligent administration of building and zoning codes ...
The legislature has apparently abolished the operation of the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
In a recent Ohio case, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous opinion that a municipality that vo...
According to a well-established common law rule, a municipal corporation is immune to tort liability...
Plaintiff sued the Town of Cocoa Beach for damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband. Pl...
Plaintiffs sought damages from the State of Washington for property destroyed by a juvenile escapee ...
The Ohio Supreme Court continued in 1983 to expand and define its abrogation of the doctrine of sove...
Plaintiff\u27s decedent was killed by a fall down the elevator shaft of a building owned and maintai...
The Supreme Court of Nebraska has assumed an active role in eliminating governmental tort immunity b...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Monroe v. Pape excluding municipalities as proper defendants in a...
There is hardly a legal doctrine so universally criticized as municipal tort immunity, which is at t...
The United States Supreme Court has held that municipalities sued for civil rights violations under ...
For most of this century, states and municipalities were immune from liability for anticompetitive a...
The doctrine of governmental immunity from tort liability historically stems from the concept that ...
Actions alleging municipal tort liability for negligent administration of building and zoning codes ...
The legislature has apparently abolished the operation of the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
In a recent Ohio case, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous opinion that a municipality that vo...
According to a well-established common law rule, a municipal corporation is immune to tort liability...
Plaintiff sued the Town of Cocoa Beach for damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband. Pl...
Plaintiffs sought damages from the State of Washington for property destroyed by a juvenile escapee ...
The Ohio Supreme Court continued in 1983 to expand and define its abrogation of the doctrine of sove...