The Supreme Court of New Jersey has held that an adult, whose religious beliefs forbid blood transfusions but who risks death if a transfusion is not given, may be compelled to submit to such treatment. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital v. Heston, 58 N.J. 576, 279 A.2d 670 (1971)
Background: Major surgical treatment in Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) presents complex ethical and legal ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an involuntarily committed mental patient has constitu...
AbstractBackground and objectivesJehovah's Witnesses patients refuse blood transfusions for religiou...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that an\u27 infant is not a neglected child under the Pen...
In two separate instances adult Jehovah\u27s Witnesses were admitted to hospitals with severe intern...
Despite serious illness, plaintiff requested, in accordance with her religious beliefs as a Jehovah\...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a surrogate decision maker may exercise the right of an adu...
A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has raised a very i...
The litigation to protect Jehovah’s Witnesses from unwanted blood transfusions, which their theology...
In this issue: [ Faith, Medicine, and Religious Liberty - Part 1, Jehovah\u27s Witnesses ]-- Blood T...
The punctum dolens of the refusal to receive blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses has been par...
This statement, found in Article I, Section 23 of the Florida Constitution, is the result of a 1980 ...
Responsible and caring parents seek the best possible medical care for their children. In the case o...
This article considers the degree to which the religious beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses are given co...
The Supreme Court has taken very different approaches to the question whether individuals have a rig...
Background: Major surgical treatment in Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) presents complex ethical and legal ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an involuntarily committed mental patient has constitu...
AbstractBackground and objectivesJehovah's Witnesses patients refuse blood transfusions for religiou...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that an\u27 infant is not a neglected child under the Pen...
In two separate instances adult Jehovah\u27s Witnesses were admitted to hospitals with severe intern...
Despite serious illness, plaintiff requested, in accordance with her religious beliefs as a Jehovah\...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a surrogate decision maker may exercise the right of an adu...
A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has raised a very i...
The litigation to protect Jehovah’s Witnesses from unwanted blood transfusions, which their theology...
In this issue: [ Faith, Medicine, and Religious Liberty - Part 1, Jehovah\u27s Witnesses ]-- Blood T...
The punctum dolens of the refusal to receive blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses has been par...
This statement, found in Article I, Section 23 of the Florida Constitution, is the result of a 1980 ...
Responsible and caring parents seek the best possible medical care for their children. In the case o...
This article considers the degree to which the religious beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses are given co...
The Supreme Court has taken very different approaches to the question whether individuals have a rig...
Background: Major surgical treatment in Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) presents complex ethical and legal ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an involuntarily committed mental patient has constitu...
AbstractBackground and objectivesJehovah's Witnesses patients refuse blood transfusions for religiou...