Topics
Simply statedWork
Disparagement is defined by the Restatement of the Law of Torts as matter which is intended by its publisher to be understood to cast doubt upon the existence or extent of another\u27s property in land, chattels or intangible things, or upon their quality .. . The act has been similarly designated as Injurious Falsehood and Trade Libel. Simply stated, it is knocking the competitor, an act as old as competitive business and one which takes on new significance in this age of effective and far-reaching communications
Policies that exploit a firm\u27s market power to extract supra-competitive profits from employees o...
Ten years have passed since the Supreme Court decided Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. and introduced fa...
This Comment contains six main parts. Part II analyzes the Lanham Act of 19461 and the likelihood of...
Under the group libel principle, a statement broadly critical of a large group generally cannot give...
In two recent cases of the Supreme Court of Appeal which attracted much attention in the media as th...
Legal action challenging a company’s advertisement for containing false or misleading statements is ...
This article discusses the traditional law of defamation, with particular emphasis on standards of l...
This Article discusses deception and its potential anticompetitive effects. Since deception lacks an...
During the nineteenth century it became settled common law in England and in the United States that ...
American contract law is supposed to facilitate the efficiency and fairness of market transactions b...
The new federal anti-dilution act, the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (the TDRA ), promise...
The wave of imitation sweeping through competitive American business has crowded the courts with unf...
This Article discusses deception and its potential anticompetitive effects. Since deception lacks an...
The law of trademark tarnishment—a type of trademark dilution—is in disarray. The basic definition i...
Plaintiff sued for treble damages under the Anti-Trust Act, alleging that the defendants had conspir...
Policies that exploit a firm\u27s market power to extract supra-competitive profits from employees o...
Ten years have passed since the Supreme Court decided Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. and introduced fa...
This Comment contains six main parts. Part II analyzes the Lanham Act of 19461 and the likelihood of...
Under the group libel principle, a statement broadly critical of a large group generally cannot give...
In two recent cases of the Supreme Court of Appeal which attracted much attention in the media as th...
Legal action challenging a company’s advertisement for containing false or misleading statements is ...
This article discusses the traditional law of defamation, with particular emphasis on standards of l...
This Article discusses deception and its potential anticompetitive effects. Since deception lacks an...
During the nineteenth century it became settled common law in England and in the United States that ...
American contract law is supposed to facilitate the efficiency and fairness of market transactions b...
The new federal anti-dilution act, the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (the TDRA ), promise...
The wave of imitation sweeping through competitive American business has crowded the courts with unf...
This Article discusses deception and its potential anticompetitive effects. Since deception lacks an...
The law of trademark tarnishment—a type of trademark dilution—is in disarray. The basic definition i...
Plaintiff sued for treble damages under the Anti-Trust Act, alleging that the defendants had conspir...
Policies that exploit a firm\u27s market power to extract supra-competitive profits from employees o...
Ten years have passed since the Supreme Court decided Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. and introduced fa...
This Comment contains six main parts. Part II analyzes the Lanham Act of 19461 and the likelihood of...
Add to ORKG