Add to ORKGIn the 1968 Pennsylvania primary election the voters of that state adopted in toto the recommendations of their constitutional convention. Included among these recommendations was a revision of the Pennsylvania judicial article. This revision contained as one important element a proposal for the adoption of what has come to be known as the Merit Plan for judicial selection and tenure
President Milo N. Feightner selected from Martindale Hubbell an outstanding lawyer from each state o...
Indiana\u27s method of selecting its judiciary by the partisan election process has for years been c...
This Article reviews some of the factors that have diminished the appeal of merit selection for judg...
During the twentieth century, judicial reformers attempting to depoliticize the selection of state c...
This article describes the history of judicial selection in the state of Pennsylvania. It describes ...
This Article demonstrates that merit selection is functioning commendably in Arizona and, for the mo...
This article is written in the hope that it will be helpful to members of the Nebraska Bar in famili...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
Attempts to improve the integrity of the judiciary have focused on the proper method of selecting ju...
Delegates to Alaska\u27s Constitutional Convention adopted a Judiciary Article that called for the s...
This article argues that popularly electing judges is incompatible with the three basic elements of ...
The judicial selection and retention provisions of the Alaska Constitution, found in Article IV, ach...
Tennessee\u27s merit system for selecting judges - referred to as the Tennessee Plan - has been cont...
Judicial selection through the process of popular election, while not a perfect instrument, provides...
The scholarly debate about how to select state judges has been ongoing for decades; the public debat...
President Milo N. Feightner selected from Martindale Hubbell an outstanding lawyer from each state o...
Indiana\u27s method of selecting its judiciary by the partisan election process has for years been c...
This Article reviews some of the factors that have diminished the appeal of merit selection for judg...
During the twentieth century, judicial reformers attempting to depoliticize the selection of state c...
This article describes the history of judicial selection in the state of Pennsylvania. It describes ...
This Article demonstrates that merit selection is functioning commendably in Arizona and, for the mo...
This article is written in the hope that it will be helpful to members of the Nebraska Bar in famili...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
Attempts to improve the integrity of the judiciary have focused on the proper method of selecting ju...
Delegates to Alaska\u27s Constitutional Convention adopted a Judiciary Article that called for the s...
This article argues that popularly electing judges is incompatible with the three basic elements of ...
The judicial selection and retention provisions of the Alaska Constitution, found in Article IV, ach...
Tennessee\u27s merit system for selecting judges - referred to as the Tennessee Plan - has been cont...
Judicial selection through the process of popular election, while not a perfect instrument, provides...
The scholarly debate about how to select state judges has been ongoing for decades; the public debat...
President Milo N. Feightner selected from Martindale Hubbell an outstanding lawyer from each state o...
Indiana\u27s method of selecting its judiciary by the partisan election process has for years been c...
This Article reviews some of the factors that have diminished the appeal of merit selection for judg...