Topics
PennsylvaniaPlace
Supreme CourtPlace
State Relations-The Pennsylvania Supreme Court finds it highly inappropriate to clarify state law relevant to issues raised in a federal court. In Re Estate of Girard, 423 Pa. 297, 224 A.2d 761 (1966)
On November 2, 2009, oral arguments were heard by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Bea...
COVID-19 has wreaked havoc on so much of our lives, including how to run our elections. Yet the fede...
The first section of this article considers the power of state courts to hear federal cases. Since i...
of federalism and the federal courts. ABSTRACT: This article considers some of the Supreme Court’s r...
In a suit on a contract brought in the United States District Court in Delaware, based on diversity ...
Transfer under section 1404 (a) of Judicial Code,a 1404 (a) transfer from one federal court in one j...
Recent Supreme Court election law jurisprudence reflects an unspoken, pernicious trend. Without iden...
The Pennsylvania Reapportionment Act held unconstitutional. Butcher v. Bloom, 415 Pa. 438, 203 A. 2d...
The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a federal district court in Ohio was no...
Collected biweekly contributions to the Pennsylvania Capital-Star, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news si...
This Commentary argues that the Court decided New York v. United States incorrectly. The Court faile...
A highly divided Court again addressed the relatively new doctrine in constitutional law: state exe...
Abstract: We know from Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins that unless the Constitution or a federal statute p...
The increasing tendency of state legislatures to establish administrative agencies to regulate vario...
In response to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court\u27s decision in Blue v. Blue, Pennsylvania\u27s Gener...
On November 2, 2009, oral arguments were heard by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Bea...
COVID-19 has wreaked havoc on so much of our lives, including how to run our elections. Yet the fede...
The first section of this article considers the power of state courts to hear federal cases. Since i...
of federalism and the federal courts. ABSTRACT: This article considers some of the Supreme Court’s r...
In a suit on a contract brought in the United States District Court in Delaware, based on diversity ...
Transfer under section 1404 (a) of Judicial Code,a 1404 (a) transfer from one federal court in one j...
Recent Supreme Court election law jurisprudence reflects an unspoken, pernicious trend. Without iden...
The Pennsylvania Reapportionment Act held unconstitutional. Butcher v. Bloom, 415 Pa. 438, 203 A. 2d...
The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a federal district court in Ohio was no...
Collected biweekly contributions to the Pennsylvania Capital-Star, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news si...
This Commentary argues that the Court decided New York v. United States incorrectly. The Court faile...
A highly divided Court again addressed the relatively new doctrine in constitutional law: state exe...
Abstract: We know from Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins that unless the Constitution or a federal statute p...
The increasing tendency of state legislatures to establish administrative agencies to regulate vario...
In response to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court\u27s decision in Blue v. Blue, Pennsylvania\u27s Gener...
On November 2, 2009, oral arguments were heard by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Bea...
COVID-19 has wreaked havoc on so much of our lives, including how to run our elections. Yet the fede...
The first section of this article considers the power of state courts to hear federal cases. Since i...
Add to ORKG