Add to ORKGDeclaring their independence of an anachronism, sown in dictum and grown in error, more and more jurisdictions are participating in the movement to expunge the requirement of privity from the law of warranty. A veritable revolution against the artificial strictures of privity of warranty and its unwarranted, and all too often unjust, results has occurred in recent years. The number of jurisdictions engaged in repudiating their allegiance to this unfortunate anachronism is steadily mounting. Pennsylvania seemed to be as active in this revolution as it had been in an earlier Revolution which is regularly celebrated by appropriate ceremonies throughout the Nation, especially as it was the first jurisdiction to adopt the Uniform Commercial Code...
Since the citadel of privity first crumbled for manufacturers of defective products decades ago, sta...
The past few decades have seen the development of a trend in the field of products liability that ha...
Randy Knitwear v. American Cyanamid Co., 11 N.Y.2d 5, 181 N.E.2d 399, 226 N.Y.S.2d 363 (1962)
The doctrine of privity has dogged contract plaintiffs for several hundred years, but it has been ev...
The citadel of privity has undergone a massive assault in the field of products liability yet still ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that privity is no longer required in assumpsit suits by ...
(Excerpt) This Article surveys and analyzes the current version of section 2-318 and suggests improv...
This Note argues that if a seller and a commercial buyer are in privity, damage to a product resulti...
The implied warranty of habitability has been called the “most prominent result” of the revolution i...
The Tennessee courts have heretofore denied recovery in actions for breach of warranty in the absenc...
One of the primary causes of concern in the recent movement toward greater consumer protection has b...
In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co. the Washington plaintiff brought suit against the manufacturer of an auto...
Husband purchased a new automobile from a dealer. The contract of sale contained on its reverse side...
Absence of privity of contract between an automobile manufacturer and the ultimate purchaser and exe...
The automobile warranty disclaimer today is the subject of much controversy and abuse, often with go...
Since the citadel of privity first crumbled for manufacturers of defective products decades ago, sta...
The past few decades have seen the development of a trend in the field of products liability that ha...
Randy Knitwear v. American Cyanamid Co., 11 N.Y.2d 5, 181 N.E.2d 399, 226 N.Y.S.2d 363 (1962)
The doctrine of privity has dogged contract plaintiffs for several hundred years, but it has been ev...
The citadel of privity has undergone a massive assault in the field of products liability yet still ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that privity is no longer required in assumpsit suits by ...
(Excerpt) This Article surveys and analyzes the current version of section 2-318 and suggests improv...
This Note argues that if a seller and a commercial buyer are in privity, damage to a product resulti...
The implied warranty of habitability has been called the “most prominent result” of the revolution i...
The Tennessee courts have heretofore denied recovery in actions for breach of warranty in the absenc...
One of the primary causes of concern in the recent movement toward greater consumer protection has b...
In Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co. the Washington plaintiff brought suit against the manufacturer of an auto...
Husband purchased a new automobile from a dealer. The contract of sale contained on its reverse side...
Absence of privity of contract between an automobile manufacturer and the ultimate purchaser and exe...
The automobile warranty disclaimer today is the subject of much controversy and abuse, often with go...
Since the citadel of privity first crumbled for manufacturers of defective products decades ago, sta...
The past few decades have seen the development of a trend in the field of products liability that ha...
Randy Knitwear v. American Cyanamid Co., 11 N.Y.2d 5, 181 N.E.2d 399, 226 N.Y.S.2d 363 (1962)