In United States v. Cano, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that certain limitations apply to searches of cell phones at the border. First, the search must be limited in scope; the search must be conducted to discover digital contraband, not evidence of a future crime. Second, if the search is forensic, meaning the search greatly intrudes upon the privacy of an individual, the search is only valid if the government actor had reasonably believed that the cell phone possessed contraband
This Note explores the constitutional implications of the use of a device known as the “Stingray” in...
The warrantless search of travelers’ electronic devices as they enter and exit the United States is ...
Under current federal law, government agents at the national border have broad discretion to search ...
Across the country, circuit courts disagree over what level of suspicion, if any, is required for bo...
On May 17, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in United States v. Wurie held that...
The federal government claims that the Fourth Amendment permits it to search digital information on ...
The steady increase of U.S. citizens traveling with smart phones and other electronic devices has be...
The border search exception to the Fourth Amendment has historically given the U.S. government the r...
Americans can potentially be arrested for hundreds of nonviolent, minor offenses In fact in 2012, ne...
In 2014, in Riley v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the police must obtain a warrant b...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Article discusses a case in which a United States citizen was subject to an...
In Riley v. California, the United States Supreme Court held that a warrant is generally required fo...
Initially, this Comment will discuss the development of the search incident to arrest exception from...
Since the Supreme Court handed down Riley v. California in 2014, we have been assured that if we are...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether the government’s acquisition of...
This Note explores the constitutional implications of the use of a device known as the “Stingray” in...
The warrantless search of travelers’ electronic devices as they enter and exit the United States is ...
Under current federal law, government agents at the national border have broad discretion to search ...
Across the country, circuit courts disagree over what level of suspicion, if any, is required for bo...
On May 17, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in United States v. Wurie held that...
The federal government claims that the Fourth Amendment permits it to search digital information on ...
The steady increase of U.S. citizens traveling with smart phones and other electronic devices has be...
The border search exception to the Fourth Amendment has historically given the U.S. government the r...
Americans can potentially be arrested for hundreds of nonviolent, minor offenses In fact in 2012, ne...
In 2014, in Riley v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the police must obtain a warrant b...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Article discusses a case in which a United States citizen was subject to an...
In Riley v. California, the United States Supreme Court held that a warrant is generally required fo...
Initially, this Comment will discuss the development of the search incident to arrest exception from...
Since the Supreme Court handed down Riley v. California in 2014, we have been assured that if we are...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether the government’s acquisition of...
This Note explores the constitutional implications of the use of a device known as the “Stingray” in...
The warrantless search of travelers’ electronic devices as they enter and exit the United States is ...
Under current federal law, government agents at the national border have broad discretion to search ...