Add to ORKGComments on Re H (A Child) (Parental Responsibility: Vaccination) (CA) giving guidance on whether, and in what circumstances, the unanimous decision of both parents that their child should not be vaccinated can be overridden, and the position when the child concerned is already subject to a local authority care order. Discusses the problems of the court's approach to the threshold for state intervention, and its focus on inherent jurisdiction
Should a parent who takes advantage of a personal belief exemption to avoid vaccinating a child be h...
Alfie Evans was a terminally ill British child whose parents, clinging to hope, were desperately try...
A parent’s decision not to vaccinate a child may place others at risk if the child becomes infected ...
The article focuses on the analysis of the parent situation (or statutory representatives) who are u...
The article focuses on the analysis of the parent situation (or statutory representatives) who are u...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
In the medical treatment of children disputes can arise where parents cannot agree with one another,...
This article explores whether parents can or should be civilly liable for damages when (1) their unv...
Examines Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates (CA) on whether the court had the inherent jurisdictio...
This article undertakes a thorough analysis of the case law concerned with the provision of healthca...
This article argues for recognition of public responsibilities to protect the welfare of children wi...
This article examines the impact of the new ‘No Jab, No Pay’ and ‘No Jab, No Play’ laws on future Fa...
Notwithstanding extensive media coverage and commentary, the recent judgment ofthe High Court Family...
Parental responsibility (PR) was a concept introduced by the Children Act (CA) 1989 which aimed to r...
Recent cases concerned with the future medical treatment of a child with a life-limiting condition h...
Should a parent who takes advantage of a personal belief exemption to avoid vaccinating a child be h...
Alfie Evans was a terminally ill British child whose parents, clinging to hope, were desperately try...
A parent’s decision not to vaccinate a child may place others at risk if the child becomes infected ...
The article focuses on the analysis of the parent situation (or statutory representatives) who are u...
The article focuses on the analysis of the parent situation (or statutory representatives) who are u...
Who should have the ultimate say over a child's medical treatment? A series of high-profile withdraw...
In the medical treatment of children disputes can arise where parents cannot agree with one another,...
This article explores whether parents can or should be civilly liable for damages when (1) their unv...
Examines Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates (CA) on whether the court had the inherent jurisdictio...
This article undertakes a thorough analysis of the case law concerned with the provision of healthca...
This article argues for recognition of public responsibilities to protect the welfare of children wi...
This article examines the impact of the new ‘No Jab, No Pay’ and ‘No Jab, No Play’ laws on future Fa...
Notwithstanding extensive media coverage and commentary, the recent judgment ofthe High Court Family...
Parental responsibility (PR) was a concept introduced by the Children Act (CA) 1989 which aimed to r...
Recent cases concerned with the future medical treatment of a child with a life-limiting condition h...
Should a parent who takes advantage of a personal belief exemption to avoid vaccinating a child be h...
Alfie Evans was a terminally ill British child whose parents, clinging to hope, were desperately try...
A parent’s decision not to vaccinate a child may place others at risk if the child becomes infected ...