Add to ORKGA commonly held idea regarding the nature of time is that the future is open and the past is fixed or closed. This article investigates the notion that there is an asymmetry in openness between the past and the future. The following questions are considered: How exactly is this asymmetry in openness to be understood? What is the relation between an open future and various ontological views about the future? Is an open future a branching future? What is the relation between an open future and the question of whether contingent statements about the future are true or false? Is an open future compatible with a single determinate future
For a book symposium in Disputatio on Fabrice Correia and Sven Rosenkranz's Nothing to Com
This thesis defends the 'true-futurist' view, according to which statements about the future are eit...
Whatever its ultimate philosophical merits, it is often thought that the growing block theory presen...
A commonly held idea regarding the nature of time is that the future is open and the past is fixed o...
A basic intuition we have regarding the nature of time is that the future is open whereas the past i...
This book launches a sustained defense of a radical interpretation of the doctrine of the open futur...
In this thesis I investigate the claim that the future is in some sense ‘open’, with a view to givin...
It’s generally thought that we naively or pre-theoretically represent the future to be open. While p...
The future is different from the past. What is past is fixed and set in stone. The future, on the ot...
Open futurism is the indeterministic position according to which the future is 'open,' i.e., there i...
Intuitively, the future is open and the past fixed: there is something we can do about the future bu...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to Alan Rhoda and Daniel Rubio) for an invited s...
It is highly now intuitive that the future is open and the past is closed now-whereas it is unsettle...
In his work on the open future, Patrick Todd outlines three models of how to deal with future contin...
For a book symposium in Disputatio on Fabrice Correia and Sven Rosenkranz's Nothing to Com
This thesis defends the 'true-futurist' view, according to which statements about the future are eit...
Whatever its ultimate philosophical merits, it is often thought that the growing block theory presen...
A commonly held idea regarding the nature of time is that the future is open and the past is fixed o...
A basic intuition we have regarding the nature of time is that the future is open whereas the past i...
This book launches a sustained defense of a radical interpretation of the doctrine of the open futur...
In this thesis I investigate the claim that the future is in some sense ‘open’, with a view to givin...
It’s generally thought that we naively or pre-theoretically represent the future to be open. While p...
The future is different from the past. What is past is fixed and set in stone. The future, on the ot...
Open futurism is the indeterministic position according to which the future is 'open,' i.e., there i...
Intuitively, the future is open and the past fixed: there is something we can do about the future bu...
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to Alan Rhoda and Daniel Rubio) for an invited s...
It is highly now intuitive that the future is open and the past is closed now-whereas it is unsettle...
In his work on the open future, Patrick Todd outlines three models of how to deal with future contin...
For a book symposium in Disputatio on Fabrice Correia and Sven Rosenkranz's Nothing to Com
This thesis defends the 'true-futurist' view, according to which statements about the future are eit...
Whatever its ultimate philosophical merits, it is often thought that the growing block theory presen...