This is an introduction to the volume The Epistemology of Group Disagreement (Routledge, forthcoming), (eds.) F. Broncano-Berrocal and J.A. Carter
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rati...
We investigate to what extent it is epistemically advantageous and disadvantageous that groups whose...
What should you do when you find out that someone firmly disagrees with you on some claim P? How muc...
This is an introduction to the volume The Epistemology of Group Disagreement (Routledge, forthcoming...
The topic of this volume—theepistemology of group disagreement—aims to face the complex topic of gro...
The debate on the epistemology of disagreement has so far focused almost exclusively on cases of dis...
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreeme...
We offer a critical survey of the most discussed accounts of epistemic peer disagreement that are fo...
Article Summary. The epistemology of disagreement studies the epistemically relevant aspects of the ...
Consider two people who disagree about some important claim (e.g. the future moral and political con...
What the rational thing to do in the face of disagreement by an epistemic peer is has been much disc...
This paper proposes a methodological turn for the epistemology of disagreement, away from focusing o...
While it seems hard to deny the epistemic significance of a disagreement with our acknowledged epist...
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rati...
We investigate to what extent it is epistemically advantageous and disadvantageous that groups whose...
What should you do when you find out that someone firmly disagrees with you on some claim P? How muc...
This is an introduction to the volume The Epistemology of Group Disagreement (Routledge, forthcoming...
The topic of this volume—theepistemology of group disagreement—aims to face the complex topic of gro...
The debate on the epistemology of disagreement has so far focused almost exclusively on cases of dis...
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreeme...
We offer a critical survey of the most discussed accounts of epistemic peer disagreement that are fo...
Article Summary. The epistemology of disagreement studies the epistemically relevant aspects of the ...
Consider two people who disagree about some important claim (e.g. the future moral and political con...
What the rational thing to do in the face of disagreement by an epistemic peer is has been much disc...
This paper proposes a methodological turn for the epistemology of disagreement, away from focusing o...
While it seems hard to deny the epistemic significance of a disagreement with our acknowledged epist...
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rati...
We investigate to what extent it is epistemically advantageous and disadvantageous that groups whose...
What should you do when you find out that someone firmly disagrees with you on some claim P? How muc...