Humeanism about laws of nature is, roughly, the view that the laws of nature are just patterns, or ways of describing patterns, in the mosaic of events. In this paper I survey some of the (many!) objections that have been raised to Humeanism, considering how the Humean might respond. And I consider how we might make a positive case for Humeanism. The common thread running through all this is that the viability of the Humean view relies on the Humean having an importantly different conception of explanation to the anti-Humean
It has been argued (by e.g. Galen Strawson and John Foster) contra Humean accounts of scientific la...
According to the Humean Best Systems Account, laws are generalizations in the best systematization o...
Humeans about laws maintain that laws of nature are nothing over and above the complete distribution...
Humeanism about laws of nature is, roughly, the view that the laws of nature are just patterns, or w...
Humeanism about laws of nature — the view that the laws reduce to the Humean mosaic — is a popular v...
The paper uses the concept of typicality to spell out an argument against Humean supervenience and t...
Humeans take reality to be devoid of ‘necessary connections’: things just happen. Laws of nature are...
According to Humeanism about the laws, the laws of nature are nothing over and above certain kinds o...
The common view that Hume is a regularity theorist about laws of nature isn’t textually well grounde...
In Part I, we presented and motivated a new formulation of Humean Supervenience about Laws of Nature...
This is the first part of a two-part article in which we defend the thesis of Humean Supervenience a...
A common objection to Humeanism about natural laws is that, given Humeanism, laws cannot help explai...
This the first part of a two-part article in which we defend the thesis of Humean Supervenience abou...
I show how the two great Humean ways of understanding laws of nature, projectivism and systems theor...
Laws of nature have various roles in scientific practice. It is widely agreed that an adequate theor...
It has been argued (by e.g. Galen Strawson and John Foster) contra Humean accounts of scientific la...
According to the Humean Best Systems Account, laws are generalizations in the best systematization o...
Humeans about laws maintain that laws of nature are nothing over and above the complete distribution...
Humeanism about laws of nature is, roughly, the view that the laws of nature are just patterns, or w...
Humeanism about laws of nature — the view that the laws reduce to the Humean mosaic — is a popular v...
The paper uses the concept of typicality to spell out an argument against Humean supervenience and t...
Humeans take reality to be devoid of ‘necessary connections’: things just happen. Laws of nature are...
According to Humeanism about the laws, the laws of nature are nothing over and above certain kinds o...
The common view that Hume is a regularity theorist about laws of nature isn’t textually well grounde...
In Part I, we presented and motivated a new formulation of Humean Supervenience about Laws of Nature...
This is the first part of a two-part article in which we defend the thesis of Humean Supervenience a...
A common objection to Humeanism about natural laws is that, given Humeanism, laws cannot help explai...
This the first part of a two-part article in which we defend the thesis of Humean Supervenience abou...
I show how the two great Humean ways of understanding laws of nature, projectivism and systems theor...
Laws of nature have various roles in scientific practice. It is widely agreed that an adequate theor...
It has been argued (by e.g. Galen Strawson and John Foster) contra Humean accounts of scientific la...
According to the Humean Best Systems Account, laws are generalizations in the best systematization o...
Humeans about laws maintain that laws of nature are nothing over and above the complete distribution...