New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, are seriously jeopardizing the relevance and implementation of international humanitarian law. This paper investigates the impact of the war on terror on the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law, examining in particular whether the practices of some States, notably the US, have led to the emergence of new rules in relation to the principle of distinction. For this it looks at the principle from two separate, yet correlated, perspectives: a targeting and a detention perspective
There has always been the notion that there are specific items and people that can be legitimately a...
Authors' draft. Final version published in Jihad and its challenges to international and domestic la...
Do the laws of war govern the September 11 attacks? Did the attacks constitute war crimes ? These q...
New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, areseriously jeopardizing the relev...
New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, are seriously jeopardizing the rele...
New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, are seriously jeopardizing the rele...
The events of 11 September 2001 profoundly challenged the existing principles of international law, ...
The international humanitarian law of armed conflict … constitutes a means to an end: the preservati...
A contemporary examination of the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law Abstrac...
International Humanitarian Law has at its core distinctions and classifications: The sphere between ...
In situations of war or emergency, as in the current 'war on terrorism', international humanitarian ...
Since 2001, we have witnessed the development of a counterterrorism war paradigm built to advance cl...
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict ...
International humanitarian law (IHL) provides limits to the conduct of warring parties during armed ...
Principle of distinction obliges belligerents to always distinguish between combatants and civilians...
There has always been the notion that there are specific items and people that can be legitimately a...
Authors' draft. Final version published in Jihad and its challenges to international and domestic la...
Do the laws of war govern the September 11 attacks? Did the attacks constitute war crimes ? These q...
New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, areseriously jeopardizing the relev...
New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, are seriously jeopardizing the rele...
New security threats, which have surfaced in the past few years, are seriously jeopardizing the rele...
The events of 11 September 2001 profoundly challenged the existing principles of international law, ...
The international humanitarian law of armed conflict … constitutes a means to an end: the preservati...
A contemporary examination of the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law Abstrac...
International Humanitarian Law has at its core distinctions and classifications: The sphere between ...
In situations of war or emergency, as in the current 'war on terrorism', international humanitarian ...
Since 2001, we have witnessed the development of a counterterrorism war paradigm built to advance cl...
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict ...
International humanitarian law (IHL) provides limits to the conduct of warring parties during armed ...
Principle of distinction obliges belligerents to always distinguish between combatants and civilians...
There has always been the notion that there are specific items and people that can be legitimately a...
Authors' draft. Final version published in Jihad and its challenges to international and domestic la...
Do the laws of war govern the September 11 attacks? Did the attacks constitute war crimes ? These q...