Once something is said of something else, this “what it is that exists” or X of which what is said is said, is augmented, however minimally, by its expression. Due to the resulting progressive series, asking after what it is of which what is said is said, cannot be answered by withdrawing what is said of it, by the ungeschenmachen of predication, but only by further augmentation, even if this consists in adding predicates that negate their predecessors. On the one hand, it may be said that here, yet again, philosophy finds the world well lost, for what is as it is remains unrecoverable once subject to augmentation. Yet what would this unaugmented X be
In this paper I shall discuss the problem of cognition of\ud laws of nature on the following differe...
This essay will examine what it takes to be two foundational aspects of traditional metaphysics—the ...
Since Hume, philosophers of induction have debated the question of whether we have any reason for as...
Once something is said of something else, this “what it is that exists” or X of which what is said i...
In Schelling’s ‘On the Relation between the Real and the Ideal in Nature’ (1806), not only does the ...
What are the laws of nature? Are they abstract entities that govern physical processes? Or are they ...
In his Predication and Genesis, Wolfram Hogrebe reconstructs Schelling’s Ages of the World along the...
Dispositionalism is the view that the world is, ultimately, just a world of objects and their irredu...
This paper shows how a niche account of the metaphysics of laws of nature and physical properties—th...
It is common to appeal to governing laws of nature in order to explain the existence of natural regu...
In ‘Quiddistic Knowledge’ (Schaffer in Philos Stud 123:1–32, 2005), Jonathan Schaffer argued influen...
The conception of a ‘law of nature’ is a human product. It was created to play a role in natural phi...
Metaphysics should follow science in postulating laws alongside properties. I defend this claim agai...
Alexander Bird (2001; 2002; 2007) offers a powerful argument showing that, regardless of whether nec...
Within the context of biodiversity loss, this paper asks the question: What is response? In asking h...
In this paper I shall discuss the problem of cognition of\ud laws of nature on the following differe...
This essay will examine what it takes to be two foundational aspects of traditional metaphysics—the ...
Since Hume, philosophers of induction have debated the question of whether we have any reason for as...
Once something is said of something else, this “what it is that exists” or X of which what is said i...
In Schelling’s ‘On the Relation between the Real and the Ideal in Nature’ (1806), not only does the ...
What are the laws of nature? Are they abstract entities that govern physical processes? Or are they ...
In his Predication and Genesis, Wolfram Hogrebe reconstructs Schelling’s Ages of the World along the...
Dispositionalism is the view that the world is, ultimately, just a world of objects and their irredu...
This paper shows how a niche account of the metaphysics of laws of nature and physical properties—th...
It is common to appeal to governing laws of nature in order to explain the existence of natural regu...
In ‘Quiddistic Knowledge’ (Schaffer in Philos Stud 123:1–32, 2005), Jonathan Schaffer argued influen...
The conception of a ‘law of nature’ is a human product. It was created to play a role in natural phi...
Metaphysics should follow science in postulating laws alongside properties. I defend this claim agai...
Alexander Bird (2001; 2002; 2007) offers a powerful argument showing that, regardless of whether nec...
Within the context of biodiversity loss, this paper asks the question: What is response? In asking h...
In this paper I shall discuss the problem of cognition of\ud laws of nature on the following differe...
This essay will examine what it takes to be two foundational aspects of traditional metaphysics—the ...
Since Hume, philosophers of induction have debated the question of whether we have any reason for as...